Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34644805›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2021

Patient Perceptions of Receiving COVID-19 Test Results via an Online Patient Portal: An Open Results Survey.

Robert W Turer, Catherine M DesRoches, Liz Salmi, Tara Helmer, S Trent Rosenbloom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Shifting Mindsets: The Impact of a Patient Portal on Functioning and Recovery in a Mental Health Setting.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert W TurerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Catherine M DesRochesDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Liz SalmiDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Tara HelmerVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
S Trent RosenbloomDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Clinical trial Education, Recruitment, and Enrollment at CTSA Hubs (I-CERCH) - HEAL SupplementU24TR001579 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HARRIS, PAUL A., WILKINS, CONSUELO HOPKINS · 2016 to 2022
$34.1M
5U24TR001579-03 National Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNCATS NIH HHS U24 TR001579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, attention has been focused on "open notes" and "open results" since the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology implemented the 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule on information blocking. Open notes is an established best practice, but open results remains controversial, especially for diseases associated with stigma, morbidity, and mortality. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with all three of these effects and represents an ideal disease for the study of open results for sensitive test results.

objectivesThis study evaluates patient perspectives related to receiving COVID-19 test results via an online patient portal prior to discussion with a clinician.

methodsWe surveyed adults who underwent COVID-19 testing between March 1, 2020 and October 21, 2020 who agreed to be directly contacted about COVID-19-related research about their perspectives on receiving test results via a patient portal. We evaluated user roles (i.e., patient vs. care partner), demographic information, ease of use, impact of immediate release, notification of results, impact of viewing results on health management, and importance of sharing results with others.

resultsUsers were mostly patients themselves. Users found the portal easy to use but expressed mixed preferences about the means of notification of result availability (e.g., email, text, or phone call). Users found immediate access to results useful for managing their health, employment, and family/childcare. Many users shared their results and encouraged others to get tested. Our cohort consisted mostly of non-Hispanic white, highly educated, English-speaking patients.

conclusionOverall, patients found open results useful for COVID-19 testing and few expressed increased worries from receiving their results via the patient portal. The demographics of our cohort highlight the need for further research in patient portal equity in the age of open results.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient PortalsAdultCOVID-19 TestingHumansPerceptionSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID34644805
PMCPMC8514268
OpenAlexW3205795089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.