Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34644784›Full record

Observational studyArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2021

Safety of SF6(SonoVue®) Contrast Agent on Pharmacological Stress Echocardiogram.

Rogerio Gomes Furtado, Daniela do Carmo Rassi, Luciano Henrique Melato, Ana Caroline Reinaldo de Oliveira, Paula Meneses Nunes, Priscila Elias Baccelli, Sara Camila de Oliveira Santos, Victor Emanuel Santos, Luiz Rassi Junior, Colandy Godoy Nunes

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Therapeutic Echocardiography.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rogerio Gomes FurtadoCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-622X
Daniela do Carmo RassiCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-0439
Luciano Henrique MelatoCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Ana Caroline Reinaldo de OliveiraCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Paula Meneses NunesCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Priscila Elias BaccelliCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Sara Camila de Oliveira SantosCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Victor Emanuel SantosHospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Goiânia, Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Luiz Rassi JuniorCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Colandy Godoy NunesCentro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2007, the United States Food and Drug Administration mandated safety reviews of commercially available echocardiographic contrast agents (ECA), following reports of death. During the past years, different studies have proven the safety of ECA, but there have been few studies on SonoVue®.

objectivesTo evaluate the safety of SonoVue® during pharmacological stress echocardiography (PSE), by analyzing the incidence of allergic reactions and comparing groups regarding the appearance of arrhythmia, minor side effects and adverse events.

methodsIn this observational, prospective study, 2346 patients underwent PSE, and they were divided into the following 2 groups: group 1 with ECA (n = 1099) and group 2 without ECA (n = 1247). Patients were evaluated during PSE, at 24 hours, and at 30 days. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

resultsGroup 1 had fewer minor side effects, such as headache (5/0.5% versus 19/1.5%, p = 0.012) and less reactive hypertension (3/0.3% versus 19/1.5%, p = 0.002); fewer arrhythmias, such as ventricular extrasystoles (180/16.4% versus 247/19.8%, p = 0.032) and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (2/0.2% versus 15/1.2%, p = 0.003); and no adverse events, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or death. In group 2, 1 patient had AMI in < 24 hours (1/01%), and there were 2 deaths in < 30 days (2/0.1%). SonoVue®-related urticaria was seen in 3 (0.3%) patients, without anaphylactic reaction.

conclusionSonoVue® demonstrated safety during PSE. No cases of death, AMI, or anaphylactic reaction were observed. There was a lower incidence of minor side effects and arrhythmias in the group that received ECA, as well as a low incidence of mild allergic reactions.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaEchocardiography, StressEchocardiographyHumansPhospholipidsProspective StudiesSulfur HexafluorideUnited Statescontrast agent BR1Contrast MediaPhospholipidsSulfur Hexafluoride

Identifiers

PMID34644784
PMCPMC8757146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.