Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34644746›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2021

Willingness to pay for short- and long-acting contraceptives among female adolescents and their parents in Brazil:a pilot study.

Daniela Farah, Manoel João Batista Castello Girão, Marcelo Cunio Machado Fonseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniela FarahUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9727-9460
Manoel João Batista Castello GirãoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9377
Marcelo Cunio Machado FonsecaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-3715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate willingness to pay for short- and long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among female Brazilian adolescents and their parents, as well as their perspective on using such methods.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of female adolescents aged 13 to 19 years and their parents. We surveyed to estimate their willingness to pay for contraceptive methods. The values are expressed as mean±standard deviation in Brazilian reals (R$). Spearman correlation was employed for socioeconomic status of parents, age of adolescents and their standpoints. The methods types and adolescent and parent perspectives were analyzed by the test χ2. To determine an agreement between pairs and their willingness to pay, we used the Bland-Altman plot.

resultsA total of 165 surveys were collected. Short-acting method was significantly more acceptable to pay than the long-action method, by both parents and their daughters. Parents and their daughters are willing to pay out-of-pocket R$ 52,25±22,48 and R$ 51,63±21,24 for short-acting reversible contraception method, and R$ 176,83±130,34 and R$ 174,83±143,64, for long-acting method, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis indicated an agreement on both perspectives and the price they are willing to pay for each contraceptive method.

conclusionParents and adolescent daughters are more willing to pay for short-acting methods. We showed an agreement between the parent and the daughter for the values paid for each method.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsParentsAdolescentBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID34644746
PMCPMC8483636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.