Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34644737›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2021

Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

José Mario Alves Júnior, Francisco Eduardo Prota, Danilo Villagelin, Fernanda Bley, Wanderley Marques Bernardo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Real-world outcomes and corticosteroid sparing with mepolizumab for EGPA or HES.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José Mario Alves JúniorUnimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude, Campinas, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-3286-8619
Francisco Eduardo ProtaUnimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude, Campinas, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-1843-5240
Danilo VillagelinUnimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude, Campinas, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-7258
Fernanda BleyEbenezer Gestao em Saude - Medicina Baseada em Evidencia, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-4163-9778
Wanderley Marques BernardoEbenezer Gestao em Saude - Medicina Baseada em Evidencia, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-5207
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRCentro de Estudos em Psicologia da Saúde · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (MEP) in the management of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A systematic search was performed, and articles published until March 2021 were analyzed. The primary efficacy results evaluated were hospitalization rate related to HES, morbidity (new or worsening), relapses/failure, treatment-related adverse effects, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks, and eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks. A meta-analysis was conducted, when appropriate. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 255 patients, were included. The studies contemplated the use of MEP 300 mg/SC or 750 mg/IV. According to the evaluation of the proposed outcomes, when relapse rates/therapeutic failures were assessed, there was a 26% reduction with MEP 300 mg/SC (RD=-0.26; 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.08; p=0.04) and 48% reduction with MEP 750 mg/IV (RD=-0.48; 95% CI: -0.67, -0.30; p<0.00001). For the outcomes, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks was 48% (RD=0.48; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.62; p<0.00001), and the eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks was 51% (RD=0.51; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.63; p<0.00001), both showed a reduction with MEP 300 mg/IV and 750 mg/IV. No statistically significant differences in treatment-related adverse effects outcomes were observed for either dosage (RD=0.09; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.24; p=0.20; RD=0.09; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.29; p=0.39). Despite the positive effects observed for the studied outcomes, the exact significance remains unclear.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHypereosinophilic SyndromeHumansLeukocyte CountPrednisoneAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedmepolizumabPrednisone

Identifiers

PMID34644737
PMCPMC8478134
OpenAlexW3202117589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.