ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022
LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy With Radiologic-Pathologic Explant Correlation in Patients With SBRT-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase II Study of Optimized Individualized Adaptive Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Trial
- Histopathological outcomes of CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for HCC and predictive accuracy of the LI-RADS Radiation Treatment Response Algorithm v2024.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement After Proton Beam Therapy for Untreated Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Conventional Abdominal Ultrasound for Monitoring Tumor Size After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Editorial for "Prognostic Value of MRI-Based Treatment Response Assessment Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Comparative Analysis of mRECIST, LI-RADS TRA Version 2017, and LI-RADS Radiation TRA Version 2024".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of MRI-Based Treatment Response Assessment Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Comparative Analysis of mRECIST, LI-RADS TRA Version 2017, and LI-RADS Radiation TRA Version 2024.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- α/β for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors Treated With Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Pictorial review of the LI-RADS radiation-based treatment response algorithm v2024.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- The 2024 LI-RADS treatment response update: practical reporting after non-radiation and radiation locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Role of MRI in Imaging Assessment of Radiation-Based Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the LI-RADS radiation treatment response assessment v2024 in comparison with the modified RECIST.European radiology · 2025Article
- Nonprogressing hepatocellular carcinoma after radiation therapy: What's in a name?European radiology · 2025Article
- Temporal evolution of the LI-RADS radiation treatment response assessment on multiphase CT/MRI in patients undergoing selective internal radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.European radiology · 2025Article
- Application of LI-RADS CT/MRI Radiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024: a study after transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Simultaneous integrated boost and protection proton beam therapy approach for hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Association of LR treatment response category with outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on explant pathology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- The association between stage migration and overall survival after radiation-based therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- LI-RADS CT/MRI Treatment Response Assessment Update in 2024.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- LI-RADS radiation-based treatment response algorithm for HCC: what to know and how to use it.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOur purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm (LR-TRA) for assessing the viability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), using explant pathology as the gold standard. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent SBRT for locoregional treatment of HCC between 2008 and 2019 with subsequent liver transplantation. Five radiologists independently assessed all treated lesions by using the LR-TRA. Imaging and posttransplant histopathology were compared. Lesions were categorized as either completely (100%) or incompletely (<100%) necrotic, and performance characteristics and predictive values for the LR-TR viable and nonviable categories were calculated for each reader. Interreader reliability was calculated using the Fleiss kappa test.
resultsA total of 40 treated lesions in 26 patients (median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 59.4-65.5]; 23 men) were included. For lesions treated with SBRT, sensitivity for incomplete tumor necrosis across readers ranged between 71% and 86%, specificity between 85% and 96%, and positive predictive value between 86% and 92%, when the LR-TR equivocal category was treated as nonviable, accounting for subject clustering. When the LR-TR equivocal category was treated as viable, sensitivity of complete tumor necrosis for lesions treated with SBRT ranged from 88% to 96%, specificity from 71% to 93%, and negative predictive value from 85% to 96%. Interreader reliability was fair (k = 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.33). Although a loss of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was highly correlated with pathologically nonviable tumor on explant, almost half of the patients with APHE had pathologically nonviable tumor on explant.
conclusionsLR-TRA v2018 performs well for predicting complete and incomplete necrosis in HCC treated with SBRT. In contrast to other locoregional therapies, the presence of APHE after SBRT does not always indicate viable tumor and suggests that observation may be an appropriate strategy for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.