Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34644365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Cohort profile: The UK COVID-19 Public Experiences (COPE) prospective longitudinal mixed-methods study of health and well-being during the SARSCoV2 coronavirus pandemic.

Rhiannon Phillips, Khadijeh Taiyari, Anna Torrens-Burton, Rebecca Cannings-John, Denitza Williams, Sarah Peddle, Susan Campbell, Kathryn Hughes, David Gillespie, Paul Sellars and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coproducing data-driven organizational safety with patients: development and cognitive testing of a multisetting patient-reported safety concern tool.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  3. The evolution of patient-reported safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic within a series of study questionnaires: a multi-method analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rhiannon PhillipsCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-4598
Khadijeh TaiyariCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Anna Torrens-BurtonDivision of Population Medicine, PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Cannings-JohnCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Denitza WilliamsCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-9270
Sarah PeddlePublic and Patient Partner, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Susan CampbellPublic and Patient Partner, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Kathryn HughesDivision of Population Medicine, PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
David GillespieCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Paul SellarsCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Bethan PellCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Intervention for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Pauline Ashfield-WattDivision of Population Medicine, HealthWise Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Ashley AkbariPopulation Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-0801
Catherine Heidi SeageCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Nick PerhamCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Natalie Joseph-WilliamsDivision of Population Medicine, PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Emily HarropDivision of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
James BlaxlandCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Fiona WoodDivision of Population Medicine, PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-4074
Wouter PoortingaWelsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Karin Wahl-JorgensenCardiff School of Journalism, Media and Culture, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Delyth H JamesCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Diane CroneCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Emma Thomas-JonesCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Britt HallingbergCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Cardiff University · GBCardiff Metropolitan University · GBMarie Curie · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationMarie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-CMedical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public perceptions of pandemic viral threats and government policies can influence adherence to containment, delay, and mitigation policies such as physical distancing, hygienic practices, use of physical barriers, uptake of testing, contact tracing, and vaccination programs. The UK COVID-19 Public Experiences (COPE) study aims to identify determinants of health behaviour using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) model using a longitudinal mixed-methods approach. Here, we provide a detailed description of the demographic and self-reported health characteristics of the COPE cohort at baseline assessment, an overview of data collected, and plans for follow-up of the cohort. The COPE baseline survey was completed by 11,113 UK adult residents (18+ years of age). Baseline data collection started on the 13th of March 2020 (10-days before the introduction of the first national COVID-19 lockdown in the UK) and finished on the 13th of April 2020. Participants were recruited via the HealthWise Wales (HWW) research registry and through social media snowballing and advertising (Facebook®, Twitter®, Instagram®). Participants were predominantly female (69%), over 50 years of age (68%), identified as white (98%), and were living with their partner (68%). A large proportion (67%) had a college/university level education, and half reported a pre-existing health condition (50%). Initial follow-up plans for the cohort included in-depth surveys at 3-months and 12-months after the first UK national lockdown to assess short and medium-term effects of the pandemic on health behaviour and subjective health and well-being. Additional consent will be sought from participants at follow-up for data linkage and surveys at 18 and 24-months after the initial UK national lockdown. A large non-random sample was recruited to the COPE cohort during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, which will enable longitudinal analysis of the determinants of health behaviour and changes in subjective health and well-being over the course of the pandemic.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34644365
PMCPMC8513913
OpenAlexW3207217345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.