Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34644300›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

The novel anti-CRISPR AcrIIA22 relieves DNA torsion in target plasmids and impairs SpyCas9 activity.

Kevin J Forsberg, Danica T Schmidtke, Rachel Werther, Ruben V Uribe, Deanna Hausman, Morten O A Sommer, Barry L Stoddard, Brett K Kaiser, Harmit S Malik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanism of Cas9 inhibition by AcrIIA11.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CRISPR/Cas9 Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. AcrIIC4 inhibits type II-C Cas9 by preventing R-loop formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin J ForsbergDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1545-8925
Danica T SchmidtkeDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-6188
Rachel WertherDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3058-1550
Ruben V UribeNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9800-0409
Deanna HausmanDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0914-5022
Morten O A SommerNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-5674
Barry L StoddardDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Brett K KaiserDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Harmit S MalikDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6005-0016
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNovo Nordisk Foundation · DK

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIST32AI007640 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, ANDREW L · 2000 to 2022
$4.3M
MegaTALS: hyperspecific reagents for targeted gene modification and correctionR01GM105691 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STODDARD, BARRY L. · 2014 to 2022
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007640NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To overcome CRISPR-Cas defense systems, many phages and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) encode CRISPR-Cas inhibitors called anti-CRISPRs (Acrs). Nearly all characterized Acrs directly bind Cas proteins to inactivate CRISPR immunity. Here, using functional metagenomic selection, we describe AcrIIA22, an unconventional Acr found in hypervariable genomic regions of clostridial bacteria and their prophages from human gut microbiomes. AcrIIA22 does not bind strongly to SpyCas9 but nonetheless potently inhibits its activity against plasmids. To gain insight into its mechanism, we obtained an X-ray crystal structure of AcrIIA22, which revealed homology to PC4-like nucleic acid-binding proteins. Based on mutational analyses and functional assays, we deduced that acrIIA22 encodes a DNA nickase that relieves torsional stress in supercoiled plasmids. This may render them less susceptible to SpyCas9, which uses free energy from negative supercoils to form stable R-loops. Modifying DNA topology may provide an additional route to CRISPR-Cas resistance in phages and MGEs.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsContig MappingCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNADNA, SuperhelicalGenome, BacterialMetagenomicsPlasmidsProphagesProtein MultimerizationBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNADNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID34644300
PMCPMC8545432
OpenAlexW3206863147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.