ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021
An epidural stimulating interface unveils the intrinsic modulation of electrically motor evoked potentials in behaving rats.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In intact and spinal-injured anesthetized animals, stimulation levels that did not induce any visible muscle twitches were used to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of varying amplitude, reflecting the temporal and amplitude dynamics of the background excitability of spinal networks. To characterize the physiological excitability states of neuronal networks driving movement, we designed five experiments in awake rats chronically implanted with an epidural stimulating interface, with and without a spinal cord injury (SCI). First, an uninjured rat at rest underwent a series of single electrical pulses at sub-motor threshold intensity, which generated responses that were continuously recorded from flexor and extensor hindlimb muscles, showing an intrinsic patterned modulation of MEPs. Responses were recruited by increasing strengths of stimulation, and the amplitudes were moderately correlated between flexors and extensors. Next, after SCI, four awake rats at rest showed electrically induced MEPs, varying largely in amplitude, of both flexors and extensors that were mainly synchronously modulated. After full anesthesia, MEP amplitudes were largely reduced, although stimulation still generated random baseline changes, unveiling an intrinsic stochastic modulation. The present five cases demonstrate a methodology that can be feasibly replicated in a broader group of awake and behaving rats to further define experimental treatments involving neuroplasticity. Besides validating a new technology for a neural stimulating interface, the present data support the broader message that there is intrinsic patterned and stochastic modulation of baseline excitability reflecting the dynamics of physiological states of spinal networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.