Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643944›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Machine learning-assisted screening for cognitive impairment in the emergency department.

Simon R Yadgir, Collin Engstrom, Gwen Costa Jacobsohn, Rebecca K Green, Courtney M C Jones, Jeremy T Cushman, Thomas V Caprio, Amy J H Kind, Michael Lohmeier, Manish N Shah and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of emergency department patients at risk of dementia through artificial intelligence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon R YadgirBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Collin EngstromBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Gwen Costa JacobsohnBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0625-3589
Rebecca K GreenBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Courtney M C JonesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Jeremy T CushmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Thomas V CaprioDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Amy J H KindDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael LohmeierBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6331-1074
Brian W PattersonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4584-3808
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAREY E GLEASON · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Paramedic-coached ED Care Transitions to Help Older Adults Maintain their HealthR01AG050504 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Preventing Future Falls among Older Adults Presenting to the Emergency DepartmentK08HS024558 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PATTERSON, BRIAN W · 2016 to 2020
$792k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024558AHRQ HHS K08HS024558NIA NIH HHS 1R01AG050504NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesDespite a high prevalence and association with poor outcomes, screening to identify cognitive impairment (CI) in the emergency department (ED) is uncommon. Identification of high-risk subsets of older adults is a critical challenge to expanding screening programs. We developed and evaluated an automated screening tool to identify a subset of patients at high risk for CI.

methodsIn this secondary analysis of existing data collected for a randomized control trial, we developed machine-learning models to identify patients at higher risk of CI using only variables available in electronic health record (EHR). We used records from 1736 community-dwelling adults age > 59 being discharged from three EDs. Potential CI was determined based on the Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration (BOMC) test, administered in the ED. A nested cross-validation framework was used to evaluate machine-learning algorithms, comparing area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) as the primary metric of performance.

resultsBased on BOMC scores, 121 of 1736 (7%) participants screened positive for potential CI at the time of their ED visit. The best performing algorithm, an XGBoost model, predicted BOMC positivity with an AUC of 0.72. With a classification threshold of 0.4, this model had a sensitivity of 0.73, a specificity of 0.64, a negative predictive value of 0.97, and a positive predictive value of 0.13. In a hypothetical ED with 200 older adult visits per week, the use of this model would lead to a decrease in the in-person screening burden from 200 to 77 individuals in order to detect 10 of 14 patients who would fail a BOMC.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that an algorithm based on EHR data can define a subset of patients at higher risk for CI. Incorporating such an algorithm into a screening workflow could allow screening efforts and resources to be focused where they have the most impact.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMachine LearningAgedElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMass Screeningcognitive impairmentdeliriumdementiaemergency medicinemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34643944
PMCPMC8904269
OpenAlexW3205354781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.