Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643925›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2021

Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation.

Elisa De Paolis, Paola Concolino, Maria Elisabetta Onori, Concetta Santonocito, Claudia Marchetti, Anna Fagotti, Giovanni Scambia, Andrea Urbani, Angelo Minucci

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. External Quality Assessment of Molecular Testing forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa De PaolisMolecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit (MGDUnit), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Paola ConcolinoMolecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit (MGDUnit), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Elisabetta OnoriMolecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit (MGDUnit), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Concetta SantonocitoMolecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit (MGDUnit), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Claudia MarchettiDivision of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna FagottiDivision of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDivision of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea UrbaniMolecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit (MGDUnit), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Angelo MinucciMolecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit (MGDUnit), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. angelo.minucci@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0833-4334
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQA provides an efficient system to compare analytic test performances among different laboratories, which is essential to evaluate consistency of molecular test. EQA failures demands targeted corrective action plans. In this context, the complexity of the NGS techniques requires careful and continuous quality control procedures. We report a tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing benchmark discrepancy provided by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network in our laboratory during a round of EQA for somatic mutation testing of BRCA genes in relation to ovarian cancer. The critical analysis emerging from the tBRCA EQA is presented. We underline that harmonization processes are still required for the EQA in the molecular biology field, especially if applied to the evaluation of methods characterized by high complexity.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinData AccuracyFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLaboratoriesOvarian NeoplasmsQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinAllelic dropoutEMQNEQANext generation sequencingOvarian cancerTumor BRCA testing

Identifiers

PMID34643925
PMCPMC8604882
OpenAlexW3205157700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.