Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643912›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Overview: Development of Drugs Against Mycobacterium ulcerans.

Gerd Pluschke, Katharina Röltgen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerd PluschkeMolecular Immunology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. Gerd.Pluschke@swisstph.ch.
Katharina RöltgenMolecular Immunology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Stanford University · USSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many years, wide margin surgical excision of Buruli ulcer lesions has been the main approach for the treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease. The WHO now recommends an eight-week course of oral antibiotics with a combination of rifampicin and clarithromycin in Africa. However, disease management is complicated by social stigma, lack of awareness, and limited access to healthcare facilities, resulting in underreporting and frequently late initiation of medical treatment. Inadequate initial treatment can drive permanent disabilities and also limited compliance to the eight-week therapy is a limitation. Therefore, search for a faster and more simple treatment modality is ongoing, focusing primarily on the testing of new tuberculosis drug candidates for the treatment of M. ulcerans disease.

Indexed as

Buruli UlcerMycobacterium ulceransAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinPharmaceutical PreparationsBuruli ulcerDrug developmentMycobacterium ulcerans disease

Identifiers

PMID34643912
OpenAlexW3206339580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.