ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2022
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of position emission tomography derived endocardial wall strain: direct comparison with magnetic resonance using hybridAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Validation of in Vivo Myocardial Strain with PET Derived Feature Tracking: Direct Comparison with Tagging-Cine Magnetic Resonance.Annals of nuclear cardiology · 2025Article
- Risk Stratification Using Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Ratio Derived fromRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Myocardial Strain Derived fromAnnals of nuclear cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHeart transplant rejection leads to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV).
methodsA total of 15 heart transplant patients who underwent both
resultsExcellent correlations of CS and LS between PET and CMR were observed (CS: r = 0.80; p < 0.01; LS: r = 0.87; p < 0.01). Excellent ICCs were observed (0.89 and 0.85) in CS and LS derived from PET.
conclusionsWe propose the first PET strain showing an excellent agreement with the CMR strain and high reproducibility in measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.