Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643888›Full record

Trial reportProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2023

Efficacy of a Probiotic Consisting of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus PDV 1705, Bifidobacterium bifidum PDV 0903, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis PDV 1911, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum PDV 2301 in the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Vladimir Ivashkin, Victor Fomin, Sergey Moiseev, Michail Brovko, Roman Maslennikov, Anatoly Ulyanin, Victoria Sholomova, Maria Vasilyeva, Elizaveta Trush, Oleg Shifrin and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04854941 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Probiotics (Lactobacillus Rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium Bifidum, Bifidobacterium Longum Subsp. Infantis and Bifidobacterium Longum) in the Treatment of Hospitalised Patients With Novel Coronavirus Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled200ConditionsCoronavirus InfectionArmsProbiotics
NCT05231772 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Probiotics on Hemodynamic Changes and Complications of Cirrhosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsCirrhosisArmsSaccharomyces Boulardii Probiotic Supplement, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Comparative Immunomodulatory Profiles ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir IvashkinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Victor FominDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Sergey MoiseevDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Michail BrovkoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Roman MaslennikovDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation. mmmm00@yandex.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-7513-1636
Anatoly UlyaninDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Victoria SholomovaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Maria VasilyevaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elizaveta TrushDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Oleg ShifrinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elena PoluektovaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Sechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and COVID-19-associated diarrhea remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic in the treatment of COVID-19. This was a randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label trial (NCT04854941). Inpatients with confirmed COVID-19 and pneumonia were randomly assigned to a group that received a multi-strain probiotic (PRO group) or to the control group (CON group). There were 99 and 101 patients in the PRO and CON groups, respectively. No significant differences in mortality, total duration of disease and hospital stay, incidence of intensive care unit admission, need for mechanical ventilation or oxygen support, liver injury development, and changes in inflammatory biomarker levels were observed between the PRO and CON groups among all included patients as well as among subgroups delineated based on age younger or older than 65 years, and subgroups with chronic cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Diarrhea on admission was observed in 11.5% of patients; it resolved earlier in the PRO group than in the CON group (2 [1-4] vs. 4 [3-6] days; p = 0.049). Hospital-acquired diarrhea developed less frequently in the PRO group than in the CON group among patients who received a single antibiotic (0% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.023) unlike among those who received > 1 antibiotic (10.5% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.696). The studied probiotic had no significant effect on mortality and changes in most biomarkers in COVID-19. However, it was effective in treating diarrhea associated with COVID-19 and in preventing hospital-acquired diarrhea in patients who received a single antibiotic.

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium bifidumCOVID-19Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusProbioticsAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBifidobacteriumBifidobacterium longum subspecies infantisDiarrheaHumansLacticaseibacillusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCOVID-19DiarrheaLiverMortalityProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID34643888
PMCPMC8512595
OpenAlexW3207627947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.