Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643884›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Vertebrae, IVD and spinal canal boundary extraction on MRI, utilizing CT-trained active shape models.

Meletios Liaskos, Michalis A Savelonas, Pantelis A Asvestas, Dimitrios Papageorgiou, George K Matsopoulos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meletios LiaskosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Michalis A SavelonasDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece. msavelonas@uth.gr.
Pantelis A AsvestasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios PapageorgiouMinimal Invasive Surgery Unit, Euroclinic, Athens, Greece.
George K MatsopoulosDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVertebrae, intervertebral disc (IVD) and spinal canal (SC) displacements are in the root of several spinal cord pathologies. The localization and boundary extraction of these structures, along with the quantification of their displacements, provide valuable clues for assessing each pathological condition. In this work, we propose a computational method for boundary extraction of vertebrae, IVD and SC in magnetic resonance images (MRI).

methodVertebrae shape priors derived from computed tomography (CT) images are used to guide vertebrae, IVD and SC boundary extraction in MRI. This strategy is dictated by three considerations: (1) CT is the modality of choice for highlighting solid structures such as vertebrae, (2) vertebrae boundaries indirectly impose constraints on the boundaries of neighbouring structures (IVD and SC), and (3) it can be observed that edges are similarly located in CT and MR images; therefore, gradient profiles and shape priors learned by active shape models (ASMs) from CT are also valid in MRI.

resultsExperimental comparisons on two MR image datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach obtains segmentation results, which are comparable to the state of the art. Moreover, the adopted bimodal strategy is validated by demonstrating that CT-derived shape priors lead to more accurate boundary extraction than MRI-derived shape priors, even in the case of MR image applications.

conclusionUnlike existing bimodal methods, the proposed one is not dependent on the availability of CT/MR image pairs, which are not usually acquired from the same patient. In addition, unlike state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods, it is not dependent on large amounts of training data. The proposed method requires a limited amount of user intervention.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansSpinal CanalTomography, X-Ray ComputedActive shape modelsCT/MRI segmentationIntervertebral discSpinal canal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.