Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643870›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2022

CRISPR/Cas 9-Based Editing in the Production of Bioactive Molecules.

Amrita C Bhagwat, Amrita M Patil, Sunil D Saroj

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cell Death Mechanisms inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advancements in genetic studies of mushrooms: a comprehensive review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amrita C BhagwatSymbiosis School of Biological Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amrita M PatilSymbiosis School of Biological Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sunil D SarojSymbiosis School of Biological Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India. sunil.saroj@ssbs.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-2731

Funding

erasmus+ 598515-EPP-1-2018-1-IN-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants, fungi, and bacteria synthesize a wide range of secondary metabolites that exhibit diverse biological activities. These bioactives, due to their potential benefits in research and therapeutics, have gained immense industrial importance. There is a need to synthesize these bioactives at significantly higher concentrations using cost-effective measures to be economically viable. However, the broader study of industrially important secondary metabolites has been hindered, thus, far due to a shortage of reliable, comparatively easy, and highly effective gene manipulation techniques. With the advent of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR/Cas), there is a revolution in the field of genetic engineering. CRISPR/Cas system, due to its simplicity and ease of use. This has widened its application in plant breeding, strain improvement, and engineering the metabolic pathways involved in the biochemical synthesis of industrially valuable bioactive. This review briefly introduces the CRISPR/Cas9 system and summarizes the applications of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing tools for the production of plant and fungal-derived bioactives.

Indexed as

Biological FactorsCRISPR-Cas SystemsFungiGene EditingPlant BreedingPlantsSecondary MetabolismBiological FactorsBioactiveCRISPR/Cas9Filamentous fungiGenome editingPlantTALENs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.