Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643779›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Infratentorial lesions in multiple sclerosis patients: intra- and inter-rater variability in comparison to a fully automated segmentation using 3D convolutional neural networks.

Julia Krüger, Ann-Christin Ostwaldt, Lothar Spies, Benjamin Geisler, Alexander Schlaefer, Hagen H Kitzler, Sven Schippling, Roland Opfer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Krügerjung diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany. julia.krueger@jung-diagnostics.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-4588
Ann-Christin Ostwaldtjung diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Lothar Spiesjung diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Benjamin GeislerFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Alexander SchlaeferInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Hagen H KitzlerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sven SchipplingMultimodal Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases (MINDS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roland Opferjung diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Jungheinrich (Germany) · DEFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

bremerhavener gesellschaft für investitionsförderung und stadtentwicklung 51084589zentrales innovationsprogramm mittelstand (zim) ZF4268403TS9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAutomated quantification of infratentorial multiple sclerosis lesions on magnetic resonance imaging is clinically relevant but challenging. To overcome some of these problems, we propose a fully automated lesion segmentation algorithm using 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

methodsThe CNN was trained on a FLAIR image alone or on FLAIR and T1-weighted images from 1809 patients acquired on 156 different scanners. An additional training using an extra class for infratentorial lesions was implemented. Three experienced raters manually annotated three datasets from 123 MS patients from different scanners.

resultsThe inter-rater sensitivity (SEN) was 80% for supratentorial lesions but only 62% for infratentorial lesions. There was no statistically significant difference between the inter-rater SEN and the SEN of the CNN with respect to the raters. For supratentorial lesions, the CNN featured an intra-rater intra-scanner SEN of 0.97 (R1 = 0.90, R2 = 0.84) and for infratentorial lesion a SEN of 0.93 (R1 = 0.61, R2 = 0.73).

conclusionThe performance of the CNN improved significantly for infratentorial lesions when specifically trained on infratentorial lesions using a T1 image as an additional input and matches the detection performance of experienced raters. Furthermore, for infratentorial lesions the CNN was more robust against repeated scans than experienced raters. KEY POINTS: • A 3D convolutional neural network was trained on MRI data from 1809 patients (156 different scanners) for the quantification of supratentorial and infratentorial multiple sclerosis lesions. • Inter-rater variability was higher for infratentorial lesions than for supratentorial lesions. The performance of the 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) improved significantly for infratentorial lesions when specifically trained on infratentorial lesions using a T1 image as an additional input. • The detection performance of the CNN matches the detection performance of experienced raters.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceInfratentorial lesionsIntra- and inter-rater variabilityLesion segmentationMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID34643779
OpenAlexW3205592498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.