Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643778›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2022

Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA).

Francesco Sardanelli, Rubina M Trimboli, Nehmat Houssami, Fiona J Gilbert, Thomas H Helbich, Marina Álvarez Benito, Corinne Balleyguier, Massimo Bazzocchi, Peter Bult, Massimo Calabrese and 37 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06217458 (The Added Value of Contrast Enhanced Mammography), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06217458 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Added Value of Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) to Standard Mammography in Assessing the Extent of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinical Hospital Center RijekaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsDCIS, Breast Carcinoma in Situ, CalcificationArmsContrast Enhanced Mammography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Abbreviated and Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Francesco SardanelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. francesco.sardanelli@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9427
Rubina M TrimboliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Nehmat HoussamiSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Fiona J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas H HelbichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Research Group: Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marina Álvarez BenitoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Corinne BalleyguierDepartment of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Massimo BazzocchiInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Peter BultDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Massimo CalabreseUnit of Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Julia Camps HerreroDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Spain.
Francesco CartiaUnit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Research Group: Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea CozziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Danúbia A de AndradeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos F de Lima DocemaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Catherine DeprettoUnit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Valeria DominelliBreast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gábor ForraiDepartment of Radiology, MHEK Teaching Hospital, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Rossano GiromettiInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Steven E HarmsBreast Center of Northwest Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Sarah HilborneDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Raffaele IenziDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.MED, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Marc B I LobbesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Claudio LosioDepartment of Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stefania MontemezziDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.
Inge-Marie ObdeijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Umit A OzcanUnit of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Federica PediconiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Research Group: Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heike PreibschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
José L Raya PovedanoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Daniela SacchettoKiwifarm S.R.L, La Morra, Italy.
Gianfranco P ScaperrottaUnit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Simone SchiaffinoUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Margrethe SchloozDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Botond K SzabóDepartment of Radiology, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Donna B TaylorMedical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Özden S UlusUnit of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mireille Van GoethemGynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Radiology, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Jeroen VeltmanMaatschap Radiologie Oost-Nederland, Oldenzaal, The Netherlands.
Stefanie WeigelInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Evelyn WenkelDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Chiara ZuianiInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Giovanni Di LeoUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Udine · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITHospital Sírio-Libanês · BRHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITKent Hastanesi · TRMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Cambridge · GBAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITBarking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBErasmus MC · NLHospital de La Ribera · ESInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITMaastricht University · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue.

methodsThis observational study enrolled women aged 18-80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases.

resultsOf 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mastectomy was planned based on conventional imaging in 22.4% (MRI group) versus 14.4% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). The additional planned mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 11.3%. The overall performed first- plus second-line mastectomy rate was 36.3% (MRI group) versus 18.0% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). In women receiving conserving surgery, MRI group had a significantly lower reoperation rate (8.5% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsClinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. KEY POINTS: • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPreoperative CareYoung AdultBreast cancerBreast-conserving surgeryMagnetic resonance imagingMastectomyReoperation

Identifiers

PMID34643778
PMCPMC8831264
OpenAlexW3206810680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.