Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643760›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2021

Multi-omics prediction of oat agronomic and seed nutritional traits across environments and in distantly related populations.

Haixiao Hu, Malachy T Campbell, Trevor H Yeats, Xuying Zheng, Daniel E Runcie, Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran, Corey Broeckling, Linxing Yao, Melanie Caffe-Treml, Lucı A Gutiérrez and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-dimensional multi-omics measured in controlled conditions are useful for maize platform and field trait predictions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Haixiao HuPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. haixiao.work@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-4839
Malachy T CampbellPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Trevor H YeatsPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Xuying ZhengPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Daniel E RuncieDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Giovanny Covarrubias-PazaranInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, 56130, Texcoco, Edo. de México, México.
Corey BroecklingProteomics and Metabolomics Facility, Colorado State University, C130 Microbiology, 2021 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Linxing YaoProteomics and Metabolomics Facility, Colorado State University, C130 Microbiology, 2021 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Melanie Caffe-TremlDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Lucı A GutiérrezDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Kevin P SmithDepartment of Agronomy & Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
James TanakaPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Owen A HoekengaCayuga Genetics Consulting Group LLC, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Mark E SorrellsPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Michael A GorePlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jean-Luc JanninkPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USColorado State University · USCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo · MXIthaca College · USSouth Dakota State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

USDA-NIFA-AFRI 2017-67007-26502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageIntegration of multi-omics data improved prediction accuracies of oat agronomic and seed nutritional traits in multi-environment trials and distantly related populations in addition to the single-environment prediction. Multi-omics prediction has been shown to be superior to genomic prediction with genome-wide DNA-based genetic markers (G) for predicting phenotypes. However, most of the existing studies were based on historical datasets from one environment; therefore, they were unable to evaluate the efficiency of multi-omics prediction in multi-environment trials and distantly related populations. To fill those gaps, we designed a systematic experiment to collect omics data and evaluate 17 traits in two oat breeding populations planted in single and multiple environments. In the single-environment trial, transcriptomic BLUP (T), metabolomic BLUP (M), G + T, G + M, and G + T + M models showed greater prediction accuracy than GBLUP for 5, 10, 11, 17, and 17 traits, respectively, and metabolites generally performed better than transcripts when combined with SNPs. In the multi-environment trial, multi-trait models with omics data outperformed both counterpart multi-trait GBLUP models and single-environment omics models, and the highest prediction accuracy was achieved when modeling genetic covariance as an unstructured covariance model. We also demonstrated that omics data can be used to prioritize loci from one population with omics data to improve genomic prediction in a distantly related population using a two-kernel linear model that accommodated both likely casual loci with large-effect and loci that explain little or no phenotypic variance. We propose that the two-kernel linear model is superior to most genomic prediction models that assume each variant is equally likely to affect the trait and can be used to improve prediction accuracy for any trait with prior knowledge of genetic architecture.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticNutritive ValueAvenaGenetic MarkersMetabolomePhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSeedsTranscriptomeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID34643760
PMCPMC8580906
OpenAlexW3209974803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.