Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643749›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Osteosynthetic treatment of a periprosthetic patellar fracture : A case report].

Philipp Guericke, Tobias Penner, Cyrus Klostermann

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp GuerickeKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Klinikum Lippe-Detmold GmbH, Detmold, Röntgenstraße 18, 32756, Detmold, Deutschland. Philipp.Guericke@Klinikum-Lippe.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-0328
Tobias PennerKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Klinikum Lippe-Detmold GmbH, Detmold, Röntgenstraße 18, 32756, Detmold, Deutschland.
Cyrus KlostermannKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Klinikum Lippe-Detmold GmbH, Detmold, Röntgenstraße 18, 32756, Detmold, Deutschland.
Klinikum Lippe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report describes the successful fixation of a periprosthetic patellar fracture in an 89-year-old female patient after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and cemented retropatellar component. Fixation was performed by use of a fixed-angle plate combined with cerclage, under preservation of the firmly fixed retropatellar prosthetic component. No complications were observed postoperatively. Radiologic controls confirmed bone healing. A range of movement of the knee joint of 0/5/110° was achieved by the last clinical examination 5 years postoperatively. The patient was free of pain and had an age-appropriate mobility. The use of fixed-angle plates in the treatment of type II periprosthetic patellar fractures according to Ortiguera and Berry can provide stable fixation while preserving the retropatellar prosthetic component. Additional augmentation by cerclage, tapes or traction screws is recommended in cases of poor bone stock or severe osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesKnee InjuriesPeriprosthetic FracturesAged, 80 and overBone PlatesFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPatellaPatellar componentPatellar osteosynthesisPatellar platingPeriprosthetic patellar fracture

Identifiers

PMID34643749
OpenAlexW3204969941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.