Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643699›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2022

Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study.

Dagmar Amtmann, Alyssa Bamer, Kara McMullen, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider, Gretchen J Carrougher, Nicole Gibran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Impact of Body Image on Physical Function and Return to Work After Burn: A Burn Model System Study.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dagmar AmtmannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-9729
Alyssa BamerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kara McMullenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Colleen M RyanShriners Hospitals for Children-Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey C SchneiderDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Spaulding Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gretchen J CarrougherDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Harborview, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nicole GibranDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Harborview, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USHarvard University · US

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPBU0001ACL HHS 90DPBU0004ACL HHS 90DPGE0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) is a commonly used burn-specific health outcome measure that includes 40 items across nine subscales. The objective of this study was to use both classical and modern psychometric methods to evaluate psychometric properties of the BSHS-B. Data were collected postburn injury by a multisite federally funded project tracking long-term outcomes. We examined dimensionality, local dependence, item fit, and functioning of response categories, homogeneity, and floor and ceiling effects. Items were fit to Item Response Theory models for evaluation. A total of 653 adults with burn injury completed the BSHS-B. Factor analyses supported unidimensionality for all subscales, but not for a total score based on all 40 items. All nine of the subscales had significant ceiling effects. Six item pairs displayed local dependence suggesting redundance and 11 items did not fit the Item Response Theory models. At least 15 items have too many response options. Results identified numerous psychometric issues with the BSHS-B. A single summary score should never be used for any purpose. Psychometric properties of the scale need to be improved by removing redundant items, reducing response categories, and modifying or deleting problematic items. Additional conceptual work is needed to, at a minimum, revise the work subscale and optimally to revisit and clearly define the constructs measured by all the subscales. Additional items are needed to address ceiling effects.

Indexed as

BurnsRehabilitation ResearchAdultDisability EvaluationHumansIndependent LivingPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34643699
PMCPMC9165660
OpenAlexW3206346464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.