Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643465›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2021

Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.

Lauren J Beesley, Irina Bondarenko, Michael R Elliot, Allison W Kurian, Steven J Katz, Jeremy Mg Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and validation of machine learning for pathological changes in high myopia patients with tessellated fundus: a cross-sectional study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [Inflammatory phenotypes in sepsis and the role of vitamin C on the corresponding phenotypes].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Marital Failure and Subsequent Heart Failure: A Prospective Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren J BeesleyDepartment of Biostatistics, 1259University of Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-5944
Irina BondarenkoDepartment of Biostatistics, 1259University of Michigan, USA.
Michael R ElliotDepartment of Biostatistics, 1259University of Michigan, USA.
Allison W KurianDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, 6429Stanford University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-9470
Steven J KatzDepartment of Internal Medicine, 1259University of Michigan, USA.
Jeremy Mg TaylorDepartment of Biostatistics, 1259University of Michigan, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer BiomarkersR01CA129102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS, TAYLOR, JEREMY M.G. · 2009 to 2021
$3.3M
Genetic testing, treatment use, and mortality after diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer: The Georgia-California GeneLINK InitiativeR01CA225697 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, STEVEN J., KURIAN, ALLISON W. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129102NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple imputation is a well-established general technique for analyzing data with missing values. A convenient way to implement multiple imputation is sequential regression multiple imputation, also called chained equations multiple imputation. In this approach, we impute missing values using regression models for each variable, conditional on the other variables in the data. This approach, however, assumes that the missingness mechanism is missing at random, and it is not well-justified under not-at-random missingness without additional modification. In this paper, we describe how we can generalize the sequential regression multiple imputation imputation procedure to handle missingness not at random in the setting where missingness may depend on other variables that are also missing but not on the missing variable itself, conditioning on fully observed variables. We provide algebraic justification for several generalizations of standard sequential regression multiple imputation using Taylor series and other approximations of the target imputation distribution under missingness not at random. Resulting regression model approximations include indicators for missingness, interactions, or other functions of the missingness not at random missingness model and observed data. In a simulation study, we demonstrate that the proposed sequential regression multiple imputation modifications result in reduced bias in the final analysis compared to standard sequential regression multiple imputation, with an approximation strategy involving inclusion of an offset in the imputation model performing the best overall. The method is illustrated in a breast cancer study, where the goal is to estimate the prevalence of a specific genetic pathogenic variant.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsResearch DesignBiasComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansChained equations multiple imputationmissing data indicatornot missing at randomsequential regression multiple imputation

Identifiers

PMID34643465
PMCPMC9205685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.