Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643420›Full record

ArticlemSphere2021

Why Is the Biodegradation of Polyfluorinated Compounds So Rare?

Lawrence P Wackett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Synergistic material-microbe interface toward deeper anaerobic defluorination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Elucidating the Role of OACS environmental Au · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. RecombinantmBio · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lawrence P WackettDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesotagrid.17635.36, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3255-1101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thousands of heavily fluorinated chemicals are found in the environment, impact human and ecosystem health, and are relatively resistant to biological and chemical degradation. Their persistence in the environment is due to the inability of most microorganisms to biodegrade them. Only a very few examples of polyfluorinated compound biodegradation are known, and the reported rates are very low. This has been mostly attributed to the low chemical reactivity of the C-F bond. This Perspective goes beyond that explanation to highlight microbiological reasons why polyfluorinated compounds resist metabolism. The evolutionary and physiological impediments must be appreciated to better find, study, and harness microbes that degrade polyfluorinated compounds.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCarbonFluorinePhylogenyCarbonFluorinebiodegradationbioremediationdefluorinationdehalogenationfluorinatedmicrobesperfluorinatedPFASpolyfluorinated

Identifiers

PMID34643420
PMCPMC8513679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.