Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643408›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021

Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Are Associated with Differences in the Vaginal Microbiota of Mexican Women.

M E Nieves-Ramírez, O Partida-Rodríguez, P Moran, A Serrano-Vázquez, H Pérez-Juárez, M E Pérez-Rodríguez, M C Arrieta, C Ximénez-García, B B Finlay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M E Nieves-RamírezMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbiagrid.17091.3e, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
O Partida-RodríguezMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbiagrid.17091.3e, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3990-6294
P MoranLaboratorio de Inmunología, Unidad de Investigación de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
A Serrano-VázquezLaboratorio de Inmunología, Unidad de Investigación de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
H Pérez-JuárezLaboratorio de Inmunología, Unidad de Investigación de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
M E Pérez-RodríguezDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
M C ArrietaLaboratorio de Inmunología, UAEM Pediatría del Centro Médico Nacional SXXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-3370
C Ximénez-GarcíaLaboratorio de Inmunología, Unidad de Investigación de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
B B FinlayMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbiagrid.17091.3e, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5303-6128
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of British Columbia · CAMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is an important health concern worldwide and is one of the leading causes of death in Mexican women. Previous studies have shown changes in the female genital tract microbe community related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer; yet, this link remains unexplored in many human populations. This study evaluated the vaginal bacterial community among Mexican women with precancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL). We sequenced the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene in cervical samples from 228 Mexican women, including 121 participants with SIL, most of which were HPV positive, and 107 healthy women without HPV infection or SIL. The presence of SIL was associated with changes in composition (beta diversity) and with a higher species richness (Chao1). A comparison of HPV-positive women with and without SIL showed that microbiota changes occurred even in the absence of SIL. Multivariate association with linear models (MaAsLin) analysis yielded independent associations between HPV infection and an increase in the relative abundance of Brachybacterium conglomeratum and Brevibacterium aureum as well as a decrease in two Lactobacillus iners operational taxonomic units (OTUs). We also identified a positive independent association between HPV-16, the most common HPV subtype linked to SIL, and Brachybacterium conglomeratum. Our work indicates that HPV infection leading to SIL is primarily associated with shifts in vaginal microbiota composition, some of which may be specific to this human population.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaAdultAlphapapillomavirusBacteriaBrevibacteriumDysbiosisEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansLactobacillusMexicoMicrobiotaPapillomavirus InfectionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSocial Determinants of HealthSociodemographic FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneHPVsquamous intraepithelial lesionsvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID34643408
PMCPMC8515943
OpenAlexW3205319739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.