ReviewActa dermato-venereologica2021
The Importance of Assessing Burning and Stinging when Managing Rosacea: A Review.
Review in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Topical Compound Heparin Sodium Allantoin Gel (Main Components: Onion Extract Quercetin) for the Treatment of Rosacea.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Neurogenic Rosacea and Facial Dysesthesia: Neurovascular-Immune Mechanisms and Translational Therapeutic Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Burning Sensation and Facial Blood Flow in Rosacea Patients: An Exploration of an Invisible Symptom That Cannot Be Overlooked.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Subjective symptoms are associated with anxiety in patients with rosacea: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the Risk Factors of Rosacea Exacerbation Associated with COVID-19 Infection or Vaccination: A Cross-sectional Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Skin 101: Understanding the Fundamentals of Skin Barrier Physiology-Why is This Important for Clinicians?The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Macrophages in rosacea: pathogenesis and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rosacea, a chronic condition usually recognized by its visible presentation, can be accompanied by invisible symptoms, such as burning and stinging. The aim of this review is to gather the most recent evidence on burning and stinging, in order to further emphasize the need to address these symptoms. Inflammatory pathways can explain both the signs and symptoms of rosacea, but available treatments are still evaluated primarily on their ability to treat visible signs. Recent evidence also highlights the adverse impact of symptoms, particularly burning and stinging, on quality of life. Despite an increasing understanding of symptoms and their impact, the management of burning and stinging as part of rosacea treatment has not been widely investigated. Clinicians often underestimate the impact of these symptoms and do not routinely include them as part of management. Available therapies for rosacea have the potential to treat beyond signs, and improve burning and stinging symptoms in parallel. Further investigation is needed to better understand these benefits and to optimize the management of rosacea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.