Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34643090›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2022

Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer with Nonluminal Subtype Derive Greatest Benefit from Platinum Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Yair Lotan, Joep J de Jong, Vinnie Y T Liu, Tarek A Bismar, Stephen A Boorjian, Huei-Chung Huang, Elai Davicioni, Omar Y Mian, Jonathan L Wright, Andrea Necchi and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The androgen receptor in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Texas.
Joep J de JongDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vinnie Y T LiuVeracyte Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tarek A BismarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephen A BoorjianMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Huei-Chung HuangVeracyte Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Elai DavicioniVeracyte Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Omar Y MianDepartment of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jonathan L WrightDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Andrea NecchiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Marc A Dall'EraDepartment of Urologic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Davis, California.
Hristos Z KaimakliotisDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Peter C BlackDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ewan A GibbVeracyte Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Joost L BoormansDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLCleveland Clinic · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMayo Clinic · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) confers an absolute survival benefit of 5%-10%. There is evidence that molecular differences between tumors may impact response to therapy, highlighting a need for clinically validated biomarkers to predict response to NAC. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour bladder cancer cohorts were included. Inverse probability weighting was used to make baseline characteristics (age, sex and clinical tumor stage) between NAC-treated and untreated groups more comparable. Molecular subtypes were determined using a commercial genomic subtyping classifier. Survival rates were estimated using weighted Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the primary and secondary study end points of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival, respectively.

resultsA total of 601 patients with MIBC were included, of whom 247 had been treated with NAC and RC, and 354 underwent RC without NAC. With NAC, the overall net benefit to OS and cancer-specific survival at 3 years was 7% and 5%, respectively. After controlling for clinicopathological variables, nonluminal tumors had greatest benefit from NAC, with 10% greater OS at 3 years (71% vs 61%), while luminal tumors had minimal benefit (63% vs 65%) for NAC vs non-NAC.

conclusionsIn patients with MIBC, a commercially available molecular subtyping assay revealed nonluminal tumors received the greatest benefit from NAC, while patients with luminal tumors experienced a minimal survival benefit. A genomic classifier may help identify patients with MIBC who would benefit most from NAC.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingSurvival RateUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCisplatingene expression profilingmolecular typingneoadjuvant therapyurinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34643090
PMCPMC12721623
OpenAlexW3204984910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.