SynthesisClinical oral implants research2021
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
Synthesis in Clinical oral implants research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- German S3 guideline on implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Guideline
- A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.Clinical oral implants research · 2021Pooled it
- Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Trial
- A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial Comparing Cement-Retained Monolithic CAD-CAM Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns for Single Posterior Implant Restorations.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Trial
- Clinical performance and occlusal wear of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and zirconia-reinforced ceramic implant-supported single crowns fabricated via a digital workflow on two titanium implant systems: a 12-month prospective randomized trial.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Trial
- Cost Effectiveness of Two Short Implants Versus One Short Implant With a Cantilever in the Posterior Region: 7.5-Year Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Trial
- Monolithic Hybrid Abutment Crowns (Screw-Retained) Versus Monolithic Hybrid Abutments With Monolithic Crowns (Adhesively Cemented): Three-Year Data of a Prospective Clinical Split-Mouth Study.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025Trial
- Health economic evaluation of forced orthodontic extrusion of extensively damaged teeth: up to 6-year results from a clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- A multicenter randomized controlled clinical pilot study of buccally micro-veneered lithium-disilicate and zirconia crowns supported by titanium base abutments: 1-year outcomes.Clinical oral implants research · 2023Trial
- Fully automated deep learning for the identification and classification of dental implant brands from multimodal radiographic images.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Clinical performance of a conometric retention system for single implant restorations: 1-year analysis of a prospective multicenter study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Posterior Mandibular Implant Configurations Under Bruxism: An FEA Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparison of lithium disilicate and feldspathic CAD-on systems in implant-supported crowns: a combined mechanical testing and FEA study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- The Effect of Crown Height and Retentive Height of Abutment on the Fracture Resistance of Fatigued Monolithic Zirconia Anterior Implant Crowns-An In Vitro Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Er: YAG laser debonding performance for cement-retained zirconia implant crowns.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Optical stability of 3D-printed and milled zirconia after artificial aging and immersion in liquids: An in vitro study.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Impact of moisture condition, shade-taking device, zirconia color, and thickness on color difference values: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative finite element analysis of stress distribution of different implant-supported crown and abutment materials.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Clinical trial of dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy compared to titanium.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Long-Term Performance of Bi-Layered Single Crowns Supported by Zirconia Implants: 7.5-Year Results of a Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the survival, failure, and complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns (SCs).
methodsLiterature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until September 2020 for randomized, prospective, and retrospective clinical trials with follow-up time of at least 1 year, evaluating the outcome of veneered and/or monolithic all-ceramic SCs supported by titanium dental implants. Survival and complication rates were analyzed using robust Poisson's regression models.
resultsForty-nine RCTs and prospective studies reporting on 57 material cohorts were included. Meta-analysis of the included studies indicated an estimated 3-year survival rate of veneered-reinforced glass-ceramic implant-supported SCs of 97.6% (95% CI: 87.0%-99.6%). The estimated 3-year survival rates were 97.0% (95% CI: 94.0%-98.5%) for monolithic-reinforced glass-ceramic implant SCs, 96.9% (95% CI: 93.4%-98.6%) for veneered densely sintered alumina SCs, 96.3% (95% CI: 93.9%-97.7%) for veneered zirconia SCs, 96.1% (95% CI: 93.4%-97.8%) for monolithic zirconia SCs and only 36.3% (95% CI: 0.04%-87.7%) for resin-matrix-ceramic (RMC) SCs. With the exception of RMC SCs (p < 0.0001), the differences in survival rates between the materials did not reach statistical significance. Veneered SCs showed significantly (p = 0.017) higher annual ceramic chipping rates (1.65%) compared with monolithic SCs (0.39%). The location of the SCs, anterior vs. posterior, did not influence survival and chipping rates.
conclusionsWith the exception of RMC SCs, veneered and monolithic implant-supported ceramic SCs showed favorable short-term survival and complication rates. Significantly higher rates for ceramic chipping, however, were reported for veneered compared with monolithic ceramic SCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.