ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Diagnostic reference levels and median doses for common clinical indications of CT: findings from an international registry.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Computed Tomography of the Spine : Systematic Review on Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques to Reduce Radiation Dose.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Pooled it
- First nationwide clinical indication-based diagnostic reference levels incorporating size-specific dose estimates for adult chest CT in Morocco.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- The accuracy of navigated vs. robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a retrospective single-centre comparative study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Identifying optimal dose head CT acquisition techniques through cluster analysis from 904,209 scans.European radiology · 2026Article
- Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Adult CT Brain in Johannesburg, South Africa: A Retrospective Protocol Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Crowd-sourcing optimized abdomen CT protocols from 908,000 examinations in a large radiation dose registry.European radiology · 2026Article
- Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Tokyo.European radiology · 2026Article
- Influence of Off-Centre Positioning, Scan Direction, and Localiser Projection Angle on Organ-Specific Radiation Doses in Low-Dose Chest CT: A Simulation Study Across Four Scanner Models.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Review
- Diagnostic reference levels for indication-based CT categories in pediatric CT: data from an international registry.European radiology · 2025Article
- Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Institutional clinical indication-based typical dose values of multiphasic abdominopelvic computed tomography examinations.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Impact of tailored feedback on optimization and radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography: a comparative survey between 2021 and 2023 in Mie prefecture.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Medical Imaging and Pediatric and Adolescent Hematologic Cancer Risk.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Are CT scans dangerous? A plea for a clinical safety culture in radiation protection.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Effects of various tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head computed tomography: A phantom study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography Doses Calculation: Do We Really Need a New Dose Assessment Tool?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Abscess-A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical with CT Findings in 133 Consecutive Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing organ and effective dose of various CT localizer acquisition strategies: A Monte Carlo study.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ob jectivesThe European Society of Radiology identified 10 common indications for computed tomography (CT) as part of the European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs, EUCLID), to help standardize radiation doses. The objective of this study is to generate DRLs and median doses for these indications using data from the UCSF CT International Dose Registry.
methodsStandardized data on 3.7 million CTs in adults were collected between 2016 and 2019 from 161 institutions across seven countries (United States of America (US), Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, UK, Israel, Japan). DRLs (75th percentile) and median doses for volumetric CT-dose index (CTDI
resultsThe number of CT scans within EUCLID categories ranged from 8,933 (HCC) to over 1.2 million (stroke). There was greater variation in dose between categories than within categories (p < .001), and doses were significantly different between categories within anatomic areas. DRLs and median doses were assessed for all categories. DRLs were higher in the US for 9 of the 10 indications (except chronic sinusitis) than in Europe but with a significantly higher sample size in the US.
conclusionsDRLs for CTDI KEY POINTS: • Registry data were used to create benchmarks for 10 common indications for CT identified by the European Society of Radiology. • Observed US radiation doses were higher than European for 9 of 10 indications (except chronic sinusitis). • The presented diagnostic reference levels and median doses highlight potentially unnecessary variation in radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.