SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2022
Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06975696 (Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- CTA-based imaging parameters for differentiating tandem from isolated internal carotid artery occlusion: development of a multivariable prediction model.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- The Through-&-Through Technique: A Safe Bailout Access Route for Difficult Aortic Arch Anatomy During Thrombectomy.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- In Which Cases Is Additional Direct Surgery Useful for Mechanical Thrombectomy Failure?Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior and posterior circulation stroke: current results from a high-volume comprehensive center.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Failure of the Transfemoral Approach of Endovascular Treatment for Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-based Assessment of Internal Carotid Artery Anatomy to Predict Difficult Intracranial Access in Endovascular Recanalization of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Clinical outcome, recanalization success, and time metrics in drip-and-ship vs. drive-the-doctor: A retrospective analysis of the HEI-LU-Stroke registry.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- A Review of the Advancements in theFrontiers in medical technology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.
methodsA systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.
resultsA total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.
conclusionFailure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.