Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642788›Full record

SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2022

Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Joaquin Penide, Mahmood Mirza, Ray McCarthy, Jens Fiehler, Pasquale Mordasini, Patrick Delassus, Liam Morris, Michael Gilvarry

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06975696 (Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06975696 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2026 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsStroke AcuteArmsStandard endovascular thrombectomy with Fusion, Standard EVT without Fusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior and posterior circulation stroke: current results from a high-volume comprehensive center.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Review of the Advancements in theFrontiers in medical technology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joaquin PenideDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, MET Gateway, Galway, Ireland. joaquin.penide@gmit.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-8730
Mahmood MirzaGalway Neuro Technology Centre, Cerenovus, Galway, Ireland.
Ray McCarthyGalway Neuro Technology Centre, Cerenovus, Galway, Ireland.
Jens FiehlerKlinik und Poliklinik fur Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-7478
Pasquale MordasiniInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Patrick DelassusDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, MET Gateway, Galway, Ireland.
Liam MorrisDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, MET Gateway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-8435
Michael GilvarryGalway Neuro Technology Centre, Cerenovus, Galway, Ireland.
Galway Clinic · IEGalway-Mayo Institute of Technology · IEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

Cerenovus IP20170691Enterprise Ireland IP20170691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.

methodsA systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.

resultsA total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.

conclusionFailure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeCarotid ArteriesHumansRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeAlternative approachesComplex vasculatureFailed accessFemoral approachesTortuosity

Identifiers

PMID34642788
OpenAlexW3207755210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.