ReviewThe EPMA journal2021
Personalization of medical treatments in oncology: time for rethinking the disease concept to improve individual outcomes.
Review in The EPMA journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Genomic Data in Personalized Oncology Medicine: An Exploratory Expert-Elicitation Study with Narrative Regulatory Mapping of Regulations, Implementations, and Challenges in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Precision nanomedicine: navigating the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy and targeted drug delivery.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Machine learning in oncological pharmacogenomics: advancing personalized chemotherapy.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- Review
- Initiation of Cancer: The Journey From Mutations in Somatic Cells to Epigenetic Changes in Tissue-resident VSELs.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Incorporating Novel Technologies in Precision Oncology for Colorectal Cancer: Advancing Personalized Medicine.Cancers · 2024Review
- Pharmacogenomics and Big Data in medical oncology: developments and challenges.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- Applied Molecular-Based Quality Control of Biobanked Samples for Multi-Omics Approach.Cancers · 2023Article
- Microsatellite instability assessment is instrumental for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine: status quo and outlook.The EPMA journal · 2023Review
- Article
- Global burden of cancers attributable to tobacco smoking, 1990-2019: an ecological study.The EPMA journal · 2023Article
- An Analysis of Transcriptomic Burden Identifies Biological Progression Roadmaps for Hematological Malignancies and Solid Tumors.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Prognostic significance of pretreatment red blood cell distribution width in primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system for 3P medical approaches in multiple cohorts.The EPMA journal · 2022Article
- Effects of Breast-Conserving Surgery Combined with Immediate Autologous Fat Grafting on Oncologic Safety, Satisfaction and Psychology in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer management and research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The agenda of pharmacology discovery in the field of personalized oncology was dictated by the search of molecular targets assumed to deterministically drive tumor development. In this perspective, genes play a fundamental "causal" role while cells simply act as causal proxies, i.e., an intermediate between the molecular input and the organismal output. However, the ceaseless genomic change occurring across time within the same primary and metastatic tumor has broken the hope of a personalized treatment based only upon genomic fingerprint. Indeed, current models are unable in capturing the unfathomable complexity behind the outbreak of a disease, as they discard the contribution of non-genetic factors, environment constraints, and the interplay among different tiers of organization. Herein, we posit that a comprehensive personalized model should view at the disease as a "historical" process, in which different spatially and timely distributed factors interact with each other across multiple levels of organization, which collectively interact with a dynamic gene-expression pattern. Given that a disease is a dynamic, non-linear process - and not a static-stable condition - treatments should be tailored according to the "timing-frame" of each condition. This approach can help in detecting those critical transitions through which the system can access different attractors leading ultimately to diverse outcomes - from a pre-disease state to an overt illness or, alternatively, to recovery. Identification of such tipping points can substantiate the predictive and the preventive ambition of the Predictive, Preventive and Personalized Medicine (PPPM/3PM). However, an unusual effort is required to conjugate multi-omics approaches, data collection, and network analysis reconstruction (eventually involving innovative Artificial Intelligent tools) to recognize the critical phases and the relevant targets, which could help in patient stratification and therapy personalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.