Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642594›Full record

ReviewThe EPMA journal2021

Personalization of medical treatments in oncology: time for rethinking the disease concept to improve individual outcomes.

Mariano Bizzarri, Valeria Fedeli, Noemi Monti, Alessandra Cucina, Maroua Jalouli, Saleh H Alwasel, Abdel Halim Harrath

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EPMA journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The EPMA journal · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariano BizzarriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Systems Biology Group Lab, University La Sapienza, via Scarpa 16, 00160 Rome, Italy.
Valeria FedeliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Systems Biology Group Lab, University La Sapienza, via Scarpa 16, 00160 Rome, Italy.
Noemi MontiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Systems Biology Group Lab, University La Sapienza, via Scarpa 16, 00160 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra CucinaAzienda Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maroua JalouliDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia.
Saleh H AlwaselDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia.
Abdel Halim HarrathDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SASapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The agenda of pharmacology discovery in the field of personalized oncology was dictated by the search of molecular targets assumed to deterministically drive tumor development. In this perspective, genes play a fundamental "causal" role while cells simply act as causal proxies, i.e., an intermediate between the molecular input and the organismal output. However, the ceaseless genomic change occurring across time within the same primary and metastatic tumor has broken the hope of a personalized treatment based only upon genomic fingerprint. Indeed, current models are unable in capturing the unfathomable complexity behind the outbreak of a disease, as they discard the contribution of non-genetic factors, environment constraints, and the interplay among different tiers of organization. Herein, we posit that a comprehensive personalized model should view at the disease as a "historical" process, in which different spatially and timely distributed factors interact with each other across multiple levels of organization, which collectively interact with a dynamic gene-expression pattern. Given that a disease is a dynamic, non-linear process - and not a static-stable condition - treatments should be tailored according to the "timing-frame" of each condition. This approach can help in detecting those critical transitions through which the system can access different attractors leading ultimately to diverse outcomes - from a pre-disease state to an overt illness or, alternatively, to recovery. Identification of such tipping points can substantiate the predictive and the preventive ambition of the Predictive, Preventive and Personalized Medicine (PPPM/3PM). However, an unusual effort is required to conjugate multi-omics approaches, data collection, and network analysis reconstruction (eventually involving innovative Artificial Intelligent tools) to recognize the critical phases and the relevant targets, which could help in patient stratification and therapy personalization.

Indexed as

Critical transitionsPolypharmacologyPredictive preventive personalized medicine (PPPM)Systems biology

Identifiers

PMID34642594
PMCPMC8495186
OpenAlexW3204650008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.