Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642550›Full record

ArticleAI & society2023

Toy story or children story? Putting children and their rights at the forefront of the artificial intelligence revolution.

E Fosch-Villaronga, S van der Hof, C Lutz, A Tamò-Larrieux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AI & society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E Fosch-VillarongaeLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8325-5871
S van der HofeLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-7739
C LutzNordic Centre for Internet and Society, Department of Communication and Culture, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4389-6006
A Tamò-LarrieuxFAA-Institute for Work and Employment Research, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-7643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policymakers need to start considering the impact smart connected toys (SCTs) have on children. Equipped with sensors, data processing capacities, and connectivity, SCTs targeting children increasingly penetrate pervasively personal environments. The network of SCTs forms the Internet of Toys (IoToys) and often increases children's engagement and playtime experience. Unfortunately, this young part of the population and, most of the time, their parents are often unaware of SCTs' far-reaching capacities and limitations. The capabilities and constraints of SCTs create severe side effects at the technical, individual, and societal level. These side effects are often unforeseeable and unexpected. They arise from the technology's use and the interconnected nature of the IoToys, without necessarily involving malevolence from their creators. Although existing regulations and new ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence provide remedies to address some of the side effects, policymakers did not develop these redress mechanisms having children and SCTs in mind. This article provides an analysis of the arising side effects of SCTs and contrasts them with current regulatory redress mechanisms. We thereby highlight misfits and needs for further policymaking efforts.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChildrenChild rightsInternet of Toys (IoToys)PrivacySecuritySmart connected toys (SCTs)

Identifiers

PMID34642550
PMCPMC8494166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.