Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642484›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2022

Tumour burden and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Filippo G Dall'Olio, Aurélien Marabelle, Caroline Caramella, Camilo Garcia, Mihaela Aldea, Nathalie Chaput, Caroline Robert, Benjamin Besse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 334 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The prognostic value of pretreatment [European radiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Liquid and Tissue Biopsies for Identifying MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Analyses from the Phase II VISION Study of Tepotinib.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Role of ctDNA Tumor Fraction in Selecting Immunotherapy-Based Regimens in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Prognostic value of the CHAM score in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Filippo G Dall'OlioDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Aurélien MarabelleDrug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-3019
Caroline CaramellaDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis-Robinson, France.
Camilo GarciaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy and University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-1862
Mihaela AldeaDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Nathalie ChaputLaboratory of Immunomonitoring in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Caroline RobertDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-0238
Benjamin BesseDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Benjamin.BESSE@gustaveroussy.fr.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRInserm · FRHôpital Marie Lannelongue · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that a high tumour burden has a negative effect on anticancer immunity. The concept of tumour burden, simply defined as the total amount of cancer in the body, in contrast to molecular tumour burden, is often poorly understood by the wider medical community; nonetheless, a possible role exists in defining the optimal treatment strategy for many patients. Historically, tumour burden has been assessed using imaging. In particular, CT scans have been used to evaluate both the number and size of metastases as well as the number of organs involved. These methods are now often complemented by metabolic tumour burden, measured using the more recently developed 2-deoxy-2-[

Indexed as

HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsPrognosisTumor BurdenImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34642484
OpenAlexW3206266376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.