Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642464›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2021

Clinical assessment of the miR-34, miR-200, ZEB1 and SNAIL EMT regulation hub underlines the differential prognostic value of EMT miRs to drive mesenchymal transition and prognosis in resected NSCLC.

Simon Garinet, Audrey Didelot, Thomas Denize, Alexandre Perrier, Guillaume Beinse, Jean-Baptiste Leclere, Jean-Baptiste Oudart, Laure Gibault, Cecile Badoual, Françoise Le Pimpec-Barthes and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PrPOncogene · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-coding RNA and drug resistance in head and neck cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Heliyon · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simon GarinetAssistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Oncology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2182-8793
Audrey DidelotCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, CNRS SNC 5096, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Thomas DenizeAssistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Oncology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-7691
Alexandre PerrierCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, CNRS SNC 5096, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Guillaume BeinseCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, CNRS SNC 5096, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean-Baptiste LeclereDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean-Baptiste OudartAssistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Oncology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France.
Laure GibaultAssistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Pathology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France.
Cecile BadoualAssistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Pathology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France.
Françoise Le Pimpec-BarthesDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Pierre Laurent-PuigAssistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Oncology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France.
Antoine Legras *Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, CNRS SNC 5096, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Helene Blons *Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Oncology, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France. Helene.blons@aphp.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving curative surgery have a risk of relapse, and adjuvant treatments only translate into a 5% increase in 5-year survival. We assessed the clinical significance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and explored its association with the [SNAIL/miR-34]:[ZEB/miR-200] regulation hub to refine prognostic information.

methodsWe validated a 7-gene EMT score using a consecutive series of 176 resected NSCLC. We quantified EMT transcription factors, microRNAs (miRs) of the miR-200, miR-34 families and miR-200 promoter hypermethylation to identify outcome predictors.

resultsMost tumours presented with an EMT-hybrid state and the EMT score was not predictive of outcome. Individually, all miR-200 were inversely associated with the EMT score, but only chromosome-1 miRs, miR-200a, b, 429, were associated with disease-free survival (p = 0.08, 0.05 and 0.025) and overall survival (p = 0.013, 0.003 and 0.006). We validated these associations on The Cancer Genome Atlas data. Tumour unsupervised clustering based on miR expression identified two good prognostic groups, unrelated to the EMT score, suggesting that miR profiling may have an important clinical value.

conclusionmiR-200 family members do not have similar predictive value. Core EMT-miR, regulators and not EMT itself, identify NSCLC patients with a low risk of relapse after surgery.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansLung NeoplasmsMicroRNAsSnail Family Transcription FactorsZinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1MicroRNAsMIRN200 microRNA, humanMIRN34 microRNA, humanSNAI1 protein, humanSnail Family Transcription FactorsZEB1 protein, humanZinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1

Identifiers

PMID34642464
PMCPMC8609001
OpenAlexW3205029404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.