Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical implications of robotic assisted MRI-US fusion guided target saturation biopsy of the prostate.

Christian Wetterauer, Pawel Trotsenko, Marc Olivier Matthias, Christian Breit, Nicola Keller, Anja Meyer, Philipp Brantner, Tatjana Vlajnic, Lukas Bubendorf, David Jean Winkel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Wetterauer *Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. christian.wetterauer@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2947-4245
Pawel Trotsenko *Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Marc Olivier MatthiasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian BreitDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nicola KellerUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anja MeyerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Philipp BrantnerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tatjana VlajnicInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas BubendorfInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
David Jean WinkelDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Maciej KwiatkowskiDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Hans Helge SeifertDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Basel · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI-targeted prostate biopsy improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). However, up to 70% of PCa lesions display intralesional tumor heterogeneity. Current target sampling strategies do not yet adequately account for this finding. This prospective study included 118 patients who underwent transperineal robotic assisted biopsy of the prostate. We identified a total of 58 PCa-positive PI-RADS lesions. We compared diagnostic accuracy of a target-saturation biopsy strategy to accuracy of single, two, or three randomly selected targeted biopsy cores and analysed potential clinical implications. Intralesional detection of clinically significant cancer (ISUP ≥ 2) was 78.3% for target-saturation biopsy and 39.1%, 52.2%, and 67.4% for one, two, and three targeted cores, respectively. Target-saturation biopsies led to a more accurate characterization of PCa in terms of Gleason score and reduced rates of significant cancer missed. Compared to one, two, and three targeted biopsy cores, target-saturation biopsies led to intensified staging procedures in 21.7%, 10.9, and 8.7% of patients, and ultimately to a potential change in therapy in 39.1%, 26.1%, and 10.9% of patients. This work presents the concept of robotic-assisted target saturation biopsy. This technique has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and thus individual staging procedures and treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID34642448
PMCPMC8511036
OpenAlexW3207208352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.