Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The risk and protective factors of heightened prenatal anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Stefania Vacaru, Roseriet Beijers, Pamela D Browne, Mariëlle Cloin, Hedwig van Bakel, Marion I van den Heuvel, Carolina de Weerth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Perinatal Anxiety among Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania VacaruDonders Institute for Brain, Radboud University Medical Center, Cognition & Behavior, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. stefania.vacaru@radboudumc.nl.
Roseriet BeijersDonders Institute for Brain, Radboud University Medical Center, Cognition & Behavior, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pamela D BrowneDonders Institute for Brain, Radboud University Medical Center, Cognition & Behavior, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mariëlle CloinTilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Hedwig van BakelTilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Marion I van den HeuvelTilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Carolina de WeerthDonders Institute for Brain, Radboud University Medical Center, Cognition & Behavior, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tilburg University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Jacobs Foundation Advanced Research FellowshipKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Early Career AwardKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Sara van Dam Project GrantNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 016.195.197Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Corona: Fast-track dataNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Veni.VI.191G.025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While pregnant women are already at-risk for developing symptoms of anxiety and depression, this is heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared anxiety and depression symptoms, as indicators of psychological distress, before and during COVID-19, and investigated the role of partner, social network and healthcare support on COVID-19-related worries and consequently on psychological distress. A national survey, conducted during the first lockdown in The Netherlands, assessed COVID-19 experiences and psychological distress (N = 1421), whereas a comparison sample (N = 1439) was screened for psychological distress in 2017-2018. During COVID-19, the percentage of mothers scoring above the questionnaires' clinical cut-offs doubled for depression (6% and 12%) and anxiety (24% and 52%). Women reported increased partner support during COVID-19, compared to pre-pandemic, but decreased social and healthcare support. Higher support resulted in lower COVID-19-related worries, which in turn contributed to less psychological distress. Results suggest that a global pandemic exerts a heavy toll on pregnant women's mental health. Psychological distress was substantially higher during the pandemic than the pre-pandemic years. We identified a protective role of partner, social, and healthcare support, with important implications for the current and future crisis management. Whether increased psychological distress is transient or persistent, and whether and how it affects the future generation remains to be determined.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdultDepressionFemaleHumansMental HealthNetherlandsPregnancyPregnant PeopleQuarantineSurveys and QuestionnairesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID34642429
PMCPMC8511267
OpenAlexW3205006670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.