Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642423›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

In vitro impact preliminary assessment of airborne particulate from metalworking and woodworking industries.

Ilona Pavlovska, Anna Ramata-Stunda, Zanna Martinsone, Martins Boroduskis, Liene Patetko, Inese Martinsone, Anita Seile, Ivars Vanadzins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilona PavlovskaLaboratory of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Institute of Occupation Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia. ilona.pavlovska@rsu.lv.
Anna Ramata-StundaLaboratory of Bioanalytical and Biodosimetry Methods, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Zanna MartinsoneLaboratory of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Institute of Occupation Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Martins BoroduskisLaboratory of Bioanalytical and Biodosimetry Methods, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Liene PatetkoLaboratory of Bioanalytical and Biodosimetry Methods, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Inese MartinsoneLaboratory of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Institute of Occupation Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Anita SeileLaboratory of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Institute of Occupation Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Ivars VanadzinsLaboratory of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, Institute of Occupation Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalation is the main route of exposure to airborne pollutants. To evaluate the safety and assess the risks of occupational hazards different testing approaches are used. 3D airway epithelial tissues allow to mimic exposure conditions in vitro, generates human-relevant toxicology data, allows to elucidate the mode of action of pollutants. Gillian3500 pumps were used to collect the airborne particulate from woodworking and metalworking environments. EpiAirway tissues were used to model half working day (4 h), full working day (8 h), and 3 working day exposures to occupational pollutants. Tissue viability was assessed using an MTT assay. For preliminary assessment, RT-qPCR analyses were performed to analyze the expression of gelsolin, caspase-3, and IL-6. Tissue morphology was assessed by hematoxylin/eosin staining. An effect on the proliferation of lung epithelial cell line A549 was assessed. Acute exposure to workspace pollutants slightly affected tissue viability and did not change the morphology. No inhibiting effect was observed on the proliferation of A549 cells. Preliminary analysis showed that both types of particles suppressed the expression of gelsolin, with the effect of metalworking samples being more pronounced. A slight reduction in caspase-3 expression was observed. Particles from metalworking suppressed IL-6 expression.

Indexed as

A549 CellsCaspase 3Cell ProliferationEnvironmental MonitoringGelsolinGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansInhalation ExposureInterleukin-6LungMetallurgyOccupational ExposureParticle SizeParticulate MatterTissue SurvivalCASP3 protein, humanCaspase 3GelsolinIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6Particulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID34642423
PMCPMC8511069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.