Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34642418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Machine learning for early discrimination between transient and persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Xiao-Qin Luo, Ping Yan, Ning-Ya Zhang, Bei Luo, Mei Wang, Ying-Hao Deng, Ting Wu, Xi Wu, Qian Liu, Hong-Shen Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xiao-Qin LuoDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Ping YanDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Ning-Ya ZhangInformation Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Bei LuoDepartment of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, 999077, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Mei WangDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Ying-Hao DengDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Ting WuDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Xi WuDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Qian LiuDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Hong-Shen WangDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Yi-Xin KangDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Shao-Bin DuanDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. duansb528@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly present in critically ill patients with sepsis. Early prediction of short-term reversibility of AKI is beneficial to risk stratification and clinical treatment decision. The study sought to use machine learning methods to discriminate between transient and persistent sepsis-associated AKI. Septic patients who developed AKI within the first 48 h after ICU admission were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. AKI was classified as transient or persistent according to the Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup consensus. Five prediction models using logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network and extreme gradient boosting were constructed, and their performance was evaluated by out-of-sample testing. A simplified risk prediction model was also derived based on logistic regression and features selected by machine learning algorithms. A total of 5984 septic patients with AKI were included, 3805 (63.6%) of whom developed persistent AKI. The artificial neural network and logistic regression models achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among the five machine learning models (0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.78). The simplified 14-variable model showed adequate discrimination, with the AUC being 0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.78). At the optimal cutoff of 0.63, the sensitivity and specificity of the simplified model were 63% and 76% respectively. In conclusion, a machine learning-based simplified prediction model including routine clinical variables could be used to differentiate between transient and persistent AKI in critically ill septic patients. An easy-to-use risk calculator can promote its widespread application in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsArea Under CurveCritical IllnessDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID34642418
PMCPMC8511088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.