ArticleScientific reports2021
Machine learning for early discrimination between transient and persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of machine learning models for sepsis prediction in patients with acute pancreatitis.BMC surgery · 2023Trial
- A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo.Urolithiasis · 2023Trial
- Development and validation of a predictive model for acute kidney injury in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2022Trial
- Deep learning approaches for time series prediction of renal recovery in medical critically Ill patients with acute kidney injury: LSTM, GRU, and transformer models.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Predicting and Modeling Recovery Dynamics Post-Acute Kidney Injury: A Multicenter Study.Kidney360 · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in septic shock: a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Current and Future Applications of AI-Driven Predictive Modeling and a Proposed Framework for AI-Bioprognostics in Kidney Care.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Signalling Pathways Related to Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Children.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Current Perspectives on the Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Anesthesiology clinics · 2025Review
- Review
- External Validation of Persistent Severe Acute Kidney Injury Prediction With Machine Learning Model.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Machine Learning to Assist in Managing Acute Kidney Injury in General Wards: Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Construction and verification of a nomogram model for the risk of death in sepsis patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transforming critical care: the digital revolution's impact on intensive care units.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Review of research progress in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in the management of patients with renal dysfunction.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Predictive models of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury based on machine learning: a scoping review.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Machine learning approaches toward an understanding of acute kidney injury: current trends and future directions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Decision Support Systems and Care Delivery.Journal of medical systems · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning's role in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly present in critically ill patients with sepsis. Early prediction of short-term reversibility of AKI is beneficial to risk stratification and clinical treatment decision. The study sought to use machine learning methods to discriminate between transient and persistent sepsis-associated AKI. Septic patients who developed AKI within the first 48 h after ICU admission were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. AKI was classified as transient or persistent according to the Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup consensus. Five prediction models using logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network and extreme gradient boosting were constructed, and their performance was evaluated by out-of-sample testing. A simplified risk prediction model was also derived based on logistic regression and features selected by machine learning algorithms. A total of 5984 septic patients with AKI were included, 3805 (63.6%) of whom developed persistent AKI. The artificial neural network and logistic regression models achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among the five machine learning models (0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.78). The simplified 14-variable model showed adequate discrimination, with the AUC being 0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.78). At the optimal cutoff of 0.63, the sensitivity and specificity of the simplified model were 63% and 76% respectively. In conclusion, a machine learning-based simplified prediction model including routine clinical variables could be used to differentiate between transient and persistent AKI in critically ill septic patients. An easy-to-use risk calculator can promote its widespread application in daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.