Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641969›Full record

ReviewCell & bioscience2021

Current knowledge and challenges associated with targeted delivery of neurotrophic factors into the central nervous system: focus on available approaches.

Gozal Bahlakeh, Reza Rahbarghazi, Daruosh Mohammadnejad, Ali Abedelahi, Mohammad Karimipour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell & bioscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gozal BahlakehNeurosciences Research Center (NSRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Reza RahbarghaziStem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Daruosh MohammadnejadDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali AbedelahiDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Abedelahia@yahoo.com.
Mohammad KarimipourDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. karimipourm@tbzmed.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-4308

Funding

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1397.444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decades, numerous basic and clinical studies have been conducted to assess the delivery efficiency of therapeutic agents into the brain and spinal cord parenchyma using several administration routes. Among conventional and in-progress administrative routes, the eligibility of stem cells, viral vectors, and biomaterial systems have been shown in the delivery of NTFs. Despite these manifold advances, the close association between the delivery system and regeneration outcome remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to discuss recent progress in the delivery of these factors and the pros and cons related to each modality.

Indexed as

Administration routesDelivery systemNeuroregenerationNeurotrophic factors

Identifiers

PMID34641969
PMCPMC8507154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.