Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641952›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2021

Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells.

Tamara Rothenburger, Dominique Thomas, Yannick Schreiber, Paul R Wratil, Tamara Pflantz, Kirsten Knecht, Katie Digianantonio, Joshua Temple, Constanze Schneider, Hanna-Mari Baldauf and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Emerging roles of 3D-culture systems in tackling tumor drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Tamara RothenburgerInstitute for Medical Virology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dominique ThomasPharmazentrum frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Yannick SchreiberPharmazentrum frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Paul R WratilMax von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, Faculty of Medicine, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Tamara PflantzMax von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, Faculty of Medicine, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Kirsten KnechtDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Katie DigianantonioDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Joshua TempleDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Constanze SchneiderDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hanna-Mari BaldaufMax von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, Faculty of Medicine, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Katie-May McLaughlinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Florian RothweilerInstitute for Medical Virology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Berna BilenFaculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Samira FarmandFaculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Denisa BojkovaInstitute for Medical Virology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Rui CostaInstitute for Medical Virology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nerea FerreirósPharmazentrum frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gerd GeisslingerPharmazentrum frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas OellerichDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Yong XiongDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Oliver T KepplerMax von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, Faculty of Medicine, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Mark N WassSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Martin MichaelisSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. M.Michaelis@kent.ac.uk.
Jindrich CinatlInstitute for Medical Virology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Cinatl@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEYale University · USGerman Center for Infection Research · DEUniversity of Kent · GBDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFrankfurt Cancer Institute · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

frankfurter stiftung für krebskranke kinder n/ahilfe für krebskranke kinder frankfurt e.v. n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSAMHD1 mediates resistance to anti-cancer nucleoside analogues, including cytarabine, decitabine, and nelarabine that are commonly used for the treatment of leukaemia, through cleavage of their triphosphorylated forms. Hence, SAMHD1 inhibitors are promising candidates for the sensitisation of leukaemia cells to nucleoside analogue-based therapy. Here, we investigated the effects of the cytosine analogue CNDAC, which has been proposed to be a SAMHD1 inhibitor, in the context of SAMHD1.

methodsCNDAC was tested in 13 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cell lines, in 26 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cell lines, ten AML sublines adapted to various antileukaemic drugs, 24 single cell-derived clonal AML sublines, and primary leukaemic blasts from 24 AML patients. Moreover, 24 CNDAC-resistant sublines of the AML cell lines HL-60 and PL-21 were established. The SAMHD1 gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 and SAMHD1 depleted using RNAi, and the viral Vpx protein. Forced DCK expression was achieved by lentiviral transduction. SAMHD1 promoter methylation was determined by PCR after treatment of genomic DNA with the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease. Nucleoside (analogue) triphosphate levels were determined by LC-MS/MS. CNDAC interaction with SAMHD1 was analysed by an enzymatic assay and by crystallisation.

resultsAlthough the cytosine analogue CNDAC was anticipated to inhibit SAMHD1, SAMHD1 mediated intrinsic CNDAC resistance in leukaemia cells. Accordingly, SAMHD1 depletion increased CNDAC triphosphate (CNDAC-TP) levels and CNDAC toxicity. Enzymatic assays and crystallisation studies confirmed CNDAC-TP to be a SAMHD1 substrate. In 24 CNDAC-adapted acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) sublines, resistance was driven by DCK (catalyses initial nucleoside phosphorylation) loss. CNDAC-adapted sublines displayed cross-resistance only to other DCK substrates (e.g. cytarabine, decitabine). Cell lines adapted to drugs not affected by DCK or SAMHD1 remained CNDAC sensitive. In cytarabine-adapted AML cells, increased SAMHD1 and reduced DCK levels contributed to cytarabine and CNDAC resistance.

conclusionIntrinsic and acquired resistance to CNDAC and related nucleoside analogues are driven by different mechanisms. The lack of cross-resistance between SAMHD1/ DCK substrates and non-substrates provides scope for next-line therapies after treatment failure.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNucleosidesNucleosidesAcquired resistanceAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaCNDACDCKIntrinsic resistanceLeukemiaSAMHD1Sapacitabine

Identifiers

PMID34641952
PMCPMC8507139
OpenAlexW3205790896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.