Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641733›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Grand challenges in biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research in the era of science-policy platforms require explicit consideration of feedbacks.

Mary I O'Connor, Akira S Mori, Andrew Gonzalez, Laura E Dee, Michel Loreau, Meghan Avolio, Jarrett E K Byrnes, William Cheung, Jane Cowles, Adam T Clark and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Perspective: sustainability challenges, opportunities and solutions for long-term ecosystem observations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. A framework for the detection and attribution of biodiversity change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mary I O'ConnorDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9583-1592
Akira S MoriGraduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8422-1198
Andrew GonzalezDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Laura E DeeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-1371
Michel LoreauTheoretical and Empirical Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France.
Meghan AvolioDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jarrett E K ByrnesCollege of Science and Mathematics, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
William CheungBiodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jane CowlesDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.
Adam T ClarkInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Yann HautierEcology and Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Andrew HectorDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1309-7716
Kimberly KomatsuSmithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7056-4547
Tim NewboldCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-0051
Charlotte L OuthwaiteCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
Peter B ReichDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Eric SeabloomDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.
Laura WilliamsDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Alexandra WrightBiological Sciences Department, California State University Los Angeles, 5151 State University Drive, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Forest IsbellDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedbacks are an essential feature of resilient socio-economic systems, yet the feedbacks between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human wellbeing are not fully accounted for in global policy efforts that consider future scenarios for human activities and their consequences for nature. Failure to integrate feedbacks in our knowledge frameworks exacerbates uncertainty in future projections and potentially prevents us from realizing the full benefits of actions we can take to enhance sustainability. We identify six scientific research challenges that, if addressed, could allow future policy, conservation and monitoring efforts to quantitatively account for ecosystem and societal consequences of biodiversity change. Placing feedbacks prominently in our frameworks would lead to (i) coordinated observation of biodiversity change, ecosystem functions and human actions, (ii) joint experiment and observation programmes, (iii) more effective use of emerging technologies in biodiversity science and policy, and (iv) a more inclusive and integrated global community of biodiversity observers. To meet these challenges, we outline a five-point action plan for collaboration and connection among scientists and policymakers that emphasizes diversity, inclusion and open access. Efforts to protect biodiversity require the best possible scientific understanding of human activities, biodiversity trends, ecosystem functions and-critically-the feedbacks among them.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBiodiversityFeedbackHumansPolicybiodiversityecosystem functioningfeedbacksgrand challengesscience–policysocioecological systems

Identifiers

PMID34641733
PMCPMC8511742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.