Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641598›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Development of HPLC Method for Catechins and Related Compounds Determination and Standardization in Miang (Traditional Lanna Fermented Tea Leaf in Northern Thailand).

Sunanta Wangkarn, Kate Grudpan, Chartchai Khanongnuch, Thanawat Pattananandecha, Sutasinee Apichai, Chalermpong Saenjum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacological Activity of Cha-Miang (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibacterial Activities of Phenolic Compounds inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of Tannin Tolerant Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunanta WangkarnDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Kate GrudpanDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chartchai KhanongnuchCluster of Excellence on Biodiversity-Based Economic and Society (B.BES-CMU), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Thanawat PattananandechaCenter of Excellence for Innovation in Analytical Science and Technology (I-ANALY-S-T), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Sutasinee ApichaiCenter of Excellence for Innovation in Analytical Science and Technology (I-ANALY-S-T), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chalermpong SaenjumCenter of Excellence for Innovation in Analytical Science and Technology (I-ANALY-S-T), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for catechins and related compounds in

Indexed as

Validation Studies as TopicCaffeineCamellia sinensisCatechinChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGallic AcidPlant ExtractsPlant LeavesReference StandardsThailandCaffeineCatechinepicatechin gallateepigallocatechin gallateGallic Acidgallocatechin gallategallocatecholPlant Extractscaffeinecatechinsgallic acidHPLCmethod validationMiang

Identifiers

PMID34641598
PMCPMC8512892
OpenAlexW3201862006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.