Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641329›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Zebrafish Embryo as a Model to Test Protective Effects of Food Antioxidant Compounds.

Cristina Arteaga, Nuria Boix, Elisabet Teixido, Fernanda Marizande, Santiago Cadena, Alberto Bustillos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina ArteagaToxicology Unit, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutical Chemistry Department, Pharmacy School, University of Barcelona, Avda Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-7648
Nuria BoixToxicology Unit, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutical Chemistry Department, Pharmacy School, University of Barcelona, Avda Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet TeixidoToxicology Unit, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutical Chemistry Department, Pharmacy School, University of Barcelona, Avda Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-876X
Fernanda MarizandeFaculty of Health Sciences, Nutrition and Dietetics, Technical University of Ambato, Ambato 180207, Ecuador.
Santiago CadenaFaculty of Applied Sciences, International SEK University, Quito 170134, Ecuador.
Alberto BustillosFaculty of Health Sciences, Medicine, Technical University of Ambato, Ambato 180207, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-8113

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad AGL2013-49083-C3-1-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antioxidant activity of food compounds is one of the properties generating the most interest, due to its health benefits and correlation with the prevention of chronic disease. This activity is usually measured using in vitro assays, which cannot predict in vivo effects or mechanisms of action. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo protective effects of six phenolic compounds (naringenin, apigenin, rutin, oleuropein, chlorogenic acid, and curcumin) and three carotenoids (lycopene B, β-carotene, and astaxanthin) naturally present in foods using a zebrafish embryo model. The zebrafish embryo was pretreated with each of the nine antioxidant compounds and then exposed to tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH), a known inducer of oxidative stress in zebrafish. Significant differences were determined by comparing the concentration-response of the tBOOH induced lethality and dysmorphogenesis against the pretreated embryos with the antioxidant compounds. A protective effect of each compound, except β-carotene, against oxidative-stress-induced lethality was found. Furthermore, apigenin, rutin, and curcumin also showed protective effects against dysmorphogenesis. On the other hand, β-carotene exhibited increased lethality and dysmorphogenesis compared to the tBOOH treatment alone.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsApigeninbeta CaroteneBiological FactorsCarotenoidsCurcuminDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianFlavanonesLycopeneOxidative StressPolyphenolstert-ButylhydroperoxideAntioxidantsApigeninastaxanthinebeta CaroteneBiological FactorsCarotenoidsCurcuminFlavanonesLycopenenaringeninPolyphenolstert-ButylhydroperoxideXanthophyllsantioxidant effectcarotenoidsoxidative stresspolyphenolszebrafish embryo

Identifiers

PMID34641329
PMCPMC8510019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.