ReviewPolymers2021
A Review on Mechanical Models for Cellular Media: Investigation on Material Characterization and Numerical Simulation.
Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Probabilistic Method to Model Progressive Metatarsal Displacement and Stiffness During Fatigue Testing.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Predicting the Compressive Properties of Carbon Foam Using Artificial Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishment and Application of an Elastic-Plastic Damage Constitutive Model for Ceramic Fiber Insulation Tiles.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review Study on Mechanical Properties of Cellular Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Properties, Applications and Recent Developments of Cellular Solid Materials: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Quasi-Static Mechanical Response of Density-Graded Polyurea Elastomeric Foams.ACS applied polymer materials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular media materials are used for automobiles, aircrafts, energy-efficient buildings, transportation, and other fields due to their light weight, designability, and good impact resistance. To devise a buffer structure reasonably and avoid resource and economic loss, it is necessary to completely comprehend the constitutive relationship of the buffer structure. This paper introduces the progress on research of the mechanical properties characterization, constitutive equations, and numerical simulation of porous structures. Currently, various methods can be used to construct cellular media mechanical models including simplified phenomenological constitutive models, homogenization algorithm models, single cell models, and multi-cell models. This paper reviews current key mechanical models for cellular media, attempting to track their evolution from their inception to their latest development. These models are categorized in terms of their mechanical modeling methods. This paper focuses on the importance of constitutive relationships and microstructure models in studying mechanical properties and optimizing structural design. The key issues concerning this topic and future directions for research are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.