Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641074›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Innovation in Aircraft Cabin Interior Panels. Part II: Technical Assessment on Replacing Glass Fiber with Thermoplastic Polymers and Panels Fabricated Using Vacuum Forming Process.

Edgar Adrián Franco-Urquiza, Perla Itzel Alcántara Llanas, Victoria Rentería-Rodríguez, Raúl Samir Saleme, Rodrigo Ramírez Aguilar, Cecilia Zarate Pérez, Mauricio Torres-Arellano, Saúl Piedra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edgar Adrián Franco-UrquizaNational Council for Science and Technology, Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (CONACYT-CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1497-5928
Perla Itzel Alcántara LlanasCenter for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.
Victoria Rentería-RodríguezCenter for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6709-3374
Raúl Samir SalemeCenter for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.
Rodrigo Ramírez AguilarCenter for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.
Cecilia Zarate PérezCenter for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.
Mauricio Torres-ArellanoCenter for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.
Saúl PiedraNational Council for Science and Technology, Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (CONACYT-CIDESI), Carretera Estatal 200, km 23, Querétaro 76265, Mexico.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 297708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manufacturing process of the aircraft cabin interior panels is expensive and time-consuming, and the resulting panel requires rework due to damages that occurred during their fabrication. The aircraft interior panels must meet structural requirements; hence sandwich composites of a honeycomb core covered with two layers of pre-impregnated fiberglass skin are used. Flat sandwich composites are transformed into panels with complex shapes or geometries using the compression molding process, leading to advanced manufacturing challenges. Some aircraft interior panels are required for non-structural applications; hence sandwich composites can be substituted by cheaper alternative materials and transformed using disruptive manufacturing techniques. This paper evaluates the feasibility of replacing the honeycomb and fiberglass skin layers core with rigid polyurethane foams and thermoplastic polymers. The results show that the structural composites have higher mechanical performances than the proposed sandwich composites, but they are compatible with non-structural applications. Sandwich composite fabrication using the vacuum forming process is feasible for developing non-structural panels. This manufacturing technique is fast, easy, economical, and ecological as it uses recyclable materials. The vacuum forming also covers the entire panel, thus eliminating tapestries, paints, or finishes to the aircraft interior panels. The conclusion of the article describes the focus of future research.

Indexed as

aircraft cabin interior panelsnon-structural composite panelsthermoplastic face sheetsvacuum forming

Identifiers

PMID34641074
PMCPMC8512209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.