Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34641063›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review.

Bharat Mirchandani, Ting Zhou, Artak Heboyan, Sirasa Yodmongkol, Borvornwut Buranawat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biomolecular and Biochemical Aspects of the Oral Cavity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bharat MirchandaniDepartment of Periodontics & Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Patum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-9150
Ting ZhouSchool of Stomatology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650051, China.
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan 0025, Armenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8329-3205
Sirasa YodmongkolAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center (A-MED), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Borvornwut BuranawatDepartment of Periodontics & Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Patum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-584X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been considerable recent technological developments for implant overdenture attachments. This study presents an overview of the biomechanical and biomolecular aspects of various attachments for implant overdenture. Available articles on attachments for implant overdenture were reviewed from January 1980 to August 2021 in the ScienceDirect, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Science resources, and relevant studies were included in this study. We focused on the following topics: attachment systems, retention of various attachments, stress distribution with different attachments, the design and fabrication of attachments, digital techniques in overdenture attachments, and the effects of attachments in peri-implant health. We found that plastic resin is commonly used for ball and bar attachments, whereas nylon resin is commonly used in locator attachments. The locator system offers a valuable attachment option for implant-retained overdenture. Attachment retention reduces while lateral force increases with implant inclination in overdenture. The higher the retention of an overdenture attachment, the higher the transferred stresses. Additionally, clip loading produces more stress in implants and precision elements than bar-retained dentures. As such, we conclude that the ball and locator systems the best overdenture systems due to their superior tissue response, survival rate, and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

attachmentsdental implantoverdenturepolymethyl methacrylateretentionstress

Identifiers

PMID34641063
PMCPMC8512762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.