Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640951›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

On Measuring Implant Fixation Stability in ACL Reconstruction.

Emir Benca, Ivan Zderic, Jan Caspar, Kenneth van Knegsel, Lena Hirtler, Boyko Gueorguiev, Harald Widhalm, Reinhard Windhager, Peter Varga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emir BencaDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9029-7172
Ivan ZdericAO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-887X
Jan CasparAO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
Kenneth van KnegselAO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
Lena HirtlerCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5194-9118
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-115X
Harald WidhalmDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9739-6176
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6321-1804
Peter VargaAO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-6436
AO Foundation · CHMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Lucerne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous methods and devices are available for implant fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Biomechanical data indicate high variability in fixation stability across different devices. This study aims to provide a better insight into measuring the structural characteristics and mechanical behavior of ACL implant fixations. Fourteen human tibial specimens with reconstructed ACLs were subjected to progressively increasing dynamic loading until failure. The motions of the tibia, the proximal and distal graft ends, as well as the testing frame and actuator, were continuously recorded via a motion tracking system. Significantly higher displacements of the machine actuator (1.0 mm at graft slippage onset, and 12.2 mm at ultimate load) were measured compared to the displacements of the proximal (0.8 and 4.3 mm, respectively) and distal graft (0.1 and 3.4 mm, respectively) ends. The displacements measured at different sites showed significant correlations. The provided data suggest significant and systematic inaccuracies in the stiffness and slippage of the fixation when using machine displacement, as commonly reported in the literature. The assessment of the distal graft displacement excludes the artifactual graft elongation, and most accurately reflects the graft slippage onset indicating clinical failure. Considering the high displacement at the ultimate load, the ultimate load could be used as a standardized variable to compare different fixation methods. However, the ultimate load alone is not sufficient to qualitatively describe fixation stability.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate LigamentBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsHumansTibiaACLbiomechanical testinghuman specimensinterference screwin vitro studymotion trackingslippagestiffnessstrain

Identifiers

PMID34640951
PMCPMC8513052
OpenAlexW3204359667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.