Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640807›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Portable Ultrasound Research System for Use in Automated Bladder Monitoring with Machine-Learning-Based Segmentation.

Marc Fournelle, Tobias Grün, Daniel Speicher, Steffen Weber, Mehmet Yilmaz, Dominik Schoeb, Arkadiusz Miernik, Gerd Reis, Steffen Tretbar, Holger Hewener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Clinical, Safety, and Engineering Perspectives on Wearable Ultrasound Technology: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Special Issue "Computer Aided Diagnosis Sensors".Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marc FournelleDepartment of Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0690-9384
Tobias GrünDepartment of Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.
Daniel SpeicherDepartment of Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.
Steffen WeberDepartment of Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.
Mehmet YilmazDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Dominik SchoebDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Gerd ReisDFKI-German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Trippstadter Straße 122, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Steffen TretbarDepartment of Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-0825
Holger HewenerDepartment of Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2191-6053

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung VISIMON
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a new mobile ultrasound device for long-term and automated bladder monitoring without user interaction consisting of 32 transmit and receive electronics as well as a 32-element phased array 3 MHz transducer. The device architecture is based on data digitization and rapid transfer to a consumer electronics device (e.g., a tablet) for signal reconstruction (e.g., by means of plane wave compounding algorithms) and further image processing. All reconstruction algorithms are implemented in the GPU, allowing real-time reconstruction and imaging. The system and the beamforming algorithms were evaluated with respect to the imaging performance on standard sonographical phantoms (CIRS multipurpose ultrasound phantom) by analyzing the resolution, the SNR and the CNR. Furthermore, ML-based segmentation algorithms were developed and assessed with respect to their ability to reliably segment human bladders with different filling levels. A corresponding CNN was trained with 253 B-mode data sets and 20 B-mode images were evaluated. The quantitative and qualitative results of the bladder segmentation are presented and compared to the ground truth obtained by manual segmentation.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedUrinary BladderHumansMachine LearningPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonographybladder monitoringchannel datamachine-learningmultichannel systemPOCUSPOURsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID34640807
PMCPMC8512052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.