Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640764›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Motor Synergies Measurement Reveals the Relevant Role of Variability in Reward-Based Learning.

Carla Caballero, Francisco J Moreno, David Barbado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla CaballeroSport Sciences Department, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-232X
Francisco J MorenoSport Sciences Department, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2520-892X
David BarbadoSport Sciences Department, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4314-9185
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España DEP2016-79395P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, it is not fully understood how motor variability is regulated to ease of motor learning processes during reward-based tasks. This study aimed to assess the potential relationship between different dimensions of motor variability (i.e., the motor variability structure and the motor synergies variability) and the learning rate in a reward-based task developed using a two-axis force sensor in a computer environment. Forty-four participants performed a pretest, a training period, a posttest, and three retests. They had to release a virtual ball to hit a target using a vertical handle attached to a dynamometer in a computer-simulated reward-based task. The participants' throwing performance, learning ratio, force applied, variability structure (detrended fluctuation analysis, DFA), and motor synergy variability (good and bad variability ratio, GV/BV) were calculated. Participants with higher initial GV/BV displayed greater performance improvements than those with lower GV/BV. DFA did not show any relationship with the learning ratio. These results suggest that exploring a broader range of successful motor synergy combinations to achieve the task goal can facilitate further learning during reward-based tasks. The evolution of the motor variability synergies as an index of the individuals' learning stages seems to be supported by our study.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceRewardHumansLearningcomputer simulated taskdynamometerforce sensorlearning ratiothrowing task

Identifiers

PMID34640764
PMCPMC8513037
OpenAlexW3204203657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.