Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640752›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

IoT Intrusion Detection Taxonomy, Reference Architecture, and Analyses.

Khalid Albulayhi, Abdallah A Smadi, Frederick T Sheldon, Robert K Abercrombie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tides of Blockchain in IoT Cybersecurity.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khalid AlbulayhiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-2283
Abdallah A SmadiDepartment of ECE, Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2612-0583
Frederick T SheldonDepartment of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-2750
Robert K AbercrombieOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-4070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper surveys the deep learning (DL) approaches for intrusion-detection systems (IDSs) in Internet of Things (IoT) and the associated datasets toward identifying gaps, weaknesses, and a neutral reference architecture. A comparative study of IDSs is provided, with a review of anomaly-based IDSs on DL approaches, which include supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid methods. All techniques in these three categories have essentially been used in IoT environments. To date, only a few have been used in the anomaly-based IDS for IoT. For each of these anomaly-based IDSs, the implementation of the four categories of feature(s) extraction, classification, prediction, and regression were evaluated. We studied important performance metrics and benchmark detection rates, including the requisite efficiency of the various methods. Four machine learning algorithms were evaluated for classification purposes: Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Therefore, we compared each via the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The study model exhibits promising outcomes for all classes of attacks. The scope of our analysis examines attacks targeting the IoT ecosystem using empirically based, simulation-generated datasets (namely the Bot-IoT and the IoTID20 datasets).

Indexed as

Internet of ThingsAlgorithmsEcosystemNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector Machineanomaly-based IDSdeep learningintrusion-detection systems (IDS)IoT architecture mappingIoT securitymachine learning (ML)

Identifiers

PMID34640752
PMCPMC8512890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.