Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640736›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Polynomial, Neural Network, and Spline Wavelet Models for Continuous Wavelet Transform of Signals.

Andrey Stepanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrey StepanovInstitute of Magistracy, The Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, St. Petersburg 193232, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6876-729X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper a modified wavelet synthesis algorithm for continuous wavelet transform is proposed, allowing one to obtain a guaranteed approximation of the maternal wavelet to the sample of the analyzed signal (overlap match) and, at the same time, a formalized representation of the wavelet. What distinguishes this method from similar ones? During the procedure of wavelets' synthesis for continuous wavelet transform it is proposed to use splines and artificial neural networks. The paper also suggests a comparative analysis of polynomial, neural network, and wavelet spline models. It also deals with feasibility of using these models in the synthesis of wavelets during such studies like fine structure of signals, as well as in analysis of large parts of signals whose shape is variable. A number of studies have shown that during the wavelets' synthesis, the use of artificial neural networks (based on radial basis functions) and cubic splines enables the possibility of obtaining guaranteed accuracy in approaching the maternal wavelet to the signal's sample (with no approximation error). It also allows for its formalized representation, which is especially important during software implementation of the algorithm for calculating the continuous conversions at digital signal processors and microcontrollers. This paper demonstrates the possibility of using synthesized wavelet, obtained based on polynomial, neural network, and spline models, during the performance of an inverse continuous wavelet transform.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerWavelet AnalysisAlgorithmsartificial neural networkcontinuous wavelet transformelectroencephalogrammathematical modelpolynomialsplinesynthesiswavelet

Identifiers

PMID34640736
PMCPMC8512421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.