Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640633›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Bone Biopsy for Histomorphometry in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): State-of-the-Art and New Perspectives.

Luca Dalle Carbonare, Maria Teresa Valenti, Sandro Giannini, Maurizio Gallieni, Francesca Stefani, Roberto Ciresa, Cristina Politi, Maria Fusaro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. CKD Urine Metabolomics: Modern Concepts and Approaches.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luca Dalle CarbonareSection of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3263-6671
Maria Teresa ValentiSection of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1166-8033
Sandro GianniniClinica Medica 1, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0796-9749
Maurizio GallieniL. Sacco' Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano "La Statale", 20157 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2011-2160
Francesca StefaniSection of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Roberto CiresaSection of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Cristina PolitiCNR-IFC of Reggio Calabria, Section of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Maria FusaroNational Research Council (CNR), Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-4851
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Padua · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of bone biopsy for histomorphometric analysis is a quantitative histological examination aimed at obtaining quantitative information on bone remodeling, structure and microarchitecture. The labeling with tetracycline before the procedure also allows for a dynamic analysis of the osteoblastic activity and mineralization process. In the nephrological setting, bone biopsy is indicated to confirm the diagnosis of subclinical or focal osteomalacia and to characterize the different forms of renal osteodystrophy (ROD). Even if bone biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and specific classification of ROD, the use of this approach is very limited. The main reasons for this are the lack of widespread expertise in performing or interpreting bone biopsy results and the cost, invasiveness and potential pain associated with the procedure. In this regard, the sedation, in addition to local anesthesia routinely applied in Italian protocol, significantly reduces pain and ameliorates the pain perception of patients. Concerning the lack of widespread expertise, in Italy a Hub/Spokes model is proposed to standardize the analyses, optimizing the approach to CKD patients and reducing the costs of the procedure. In addition, new tools offer the possibility to evaluate the osteogenic potential or the ability to form bone under normal and pathological conditions, analyzing mesenchymal stem cells and their ability to differentiate in the osteogenic lineage. In the same way, circulating microRNAs are suggested as a tool for exploring osteogenic potential. The combination of different diagnostic approaches and the optimization of the bioptic procedure represent a concrete solution to spread the use of bone biopsy and optimize CKD patient management.

Indexed as

bone biopsyhistomorphometrykidneyosteodystrophyROD

Identifiers

PMID34640633
PMCPMC8509646
OpenAlexW3202844456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.